Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov 30:7:1794.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01794. eCollection 2016.

Integration of Plant Defense Traits with Biological Control of Arthropod Pests: Challenges and Opportunities

Affiliations
Review

Integration of Plant Defense Traits with Biological Control of Arthropod Pests: Challenges and Opportunities

Julie A Peterson et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Crop plants exhibit a wide diversity of defensive traits and strategies to protect themselves from damage by herbivorous pests and disease. These defensive traits may be naturally occurring or artificially selected through crop breeding, including introduction via genetic engineering. While these traits can have obvious and direct impacts on herbivorous pests, many have profound effects on higher trophic levels, including the natural enemies of herbivores. Multi-trophic effects of host plant resistance have the potential to influence, both positively and negatively, biological control. Plant defense traits can influence both the numerical and functional responses of natural enemies; these interactions can be semiochemically, plant toxin-, plant nutrient-, and/or physically mediated. Case studies involving predators, parasitoids, and pathogens of crop pests will be presented and discussed. These diverse groups of natural enemies may respond differently to crop plant traits based on their own unique biology and the ecological niches they fill. Genetically modified crop plants that have been engineered to express transgenic products affecting herbivorous pests are an additional consideration. For the most part, transgenic plant incorporated protectant (PIP) traits are compatible with biological control due to their selective toxicity to targeted pests and relatively low non-target impacts, although transgenic crops may have indirect effects on higher trophic levels and arthropod communities mediated by lower host or prey number and/or quality. Host plant resistance and biological control are two of the key pillars of integrated pest management; their potential interactions, whether they are synergistic, complementary, or disruptive, are key in understanding and achieving sustainable and effective pest management.

Keywords: biological control; herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs); host plant resistance; transgenic crops; tritrophic interactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agrawal A., Karban R., Colfer R. (2000). How leaf domatia and induced resistance affect herbivores, natural enemies and plant performance. Oikos 89 70–80. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890108.x - DOI
    1. Agrawal A., Kobayashi C., Thaler J. S. (1999). Influence of prey availability and induced host-plant resistance on omnivory by western flower thrips. Ecology 80 518–523. 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0518:IOPAAI]2.0.CO;2 - DOI
    1. Agrawal A. A. (2000a). Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tri-trophic interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3 329–395. 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00089-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agrawal A. A. (2000b). Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 89 493–500. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890308.x - DOI
    1. Agrawal A. A. (2011). Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct. Ecol. 25 420–432. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01796.x - DOI

LinkOut - more resources