Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 11;13(12):1230.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121230.

Disadvantaged Social Groups and the Cigarette Epidemic: Limits of the Diffusion of Innovations Vision

Affiliations

Disadvantaged Social Groups and the Cigarette Epidemic: Limits of the Diffusion of Innovations Vision

Myriam Khlat et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The original four-stage model of the cigarette epidemic has been extended with diffusion of innovations theory to reflect socio-economic differences in cigarette use. Recently, two revisions of the model have been proposed: (1) separate analysis of the epidemic stages for men and women, in order to improve generalization to developing countries, and; (2) addition of a fifth stage to the smoking epidemic, in order to account for the persistence of smoking in disadvantaged social groups. By developing a cohort perspective spanning a 35-year time period in France and the USA, we uncover distinctive features which challenge the currently held vision on the evolution of smoking inequalities within the framework of the cigarette epidemic. We argue that the reason for which the model may not be fit to the lower educated is that the imitation mechanism underlying the diffusion of innovations works well with regard to adoption of the habit, but is much less relevant with regard to its rejection. Based on those observations, we support the idea that the nature and timing of the epidemic differs enough to treat the stages separately for high and low education groups, and discuss policy implications.

Keywords: addiction; cigarette smoking; inequalities; public policy; social behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Smoking prevalence in men and women aged 30–34 years from 1970 to 2005, France and the United States (% and 95% confidence intervals). Source: 2010 French Health Barometer, 2010 U.S. National Health Survey Adult Sample.

References

    1. Lopez A., Collishaw N., Piha T. A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tob. Control. 1994;3:242–247. doi: 10.1136/tc.3.3.242. - DOI
    1. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. Free Press; London, UK: 2003. p. 576p.
    1. Rogers E., Shoemaker F. Communication of Innovations: A Crosscultural Approach. 2nd ed. Free Press; London, UK: 1971. p. 476p.
    1. Thun M., Peto R., Boreham J., Lopez A.D. Stages of the cigarette epidemic on entering its second century. Tob. Control. 2012;21:96–101. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050294. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixon J., Banwell C. Theory driven research designs for explaining behavioural health risk transitions: The case of smoking. Soc. Sci. Med. 2009;68:2206–2214. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.025. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources