Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 14:22:4918-4923.
doi: 10.12659/msm.902163.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Amplatz and Alken Dilators: An Eight-Year Single Tertiary Care Centre Experience

Affiliations

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Amplatz and Alken Dilators: An Eight-Year Single Tertiary Care Centre Experience

Piotr Bryniarski et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the standard procedure for patients with renal stones over 2 cm in diameter. We analyzed complications after this procedure focusing on two different methods of tract dilation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between August 2008 and April 2016 222 percutaneous nephrolithotomies were performed in a total of 208 patients. The Group I (n=123) comprised patients where Alken dilatators were used, while Group II (n=99) comprised patients where Amplatz dilators were used. Efficacy was examined based on ultrasound and x-ray examination one month after the procedure. Complications were recorded using Clavien Dindo classification. RESULTS Efficacy was 85.3% and 86.8% in group I and II, respectively (p=0.77). Grade I complications were present in 14.6% and 3%, grade II were present in 9.7% and 8%, grade IIIa were present in 2.4% and 2%, grade IIIb were present in 1.6% and 2%, grade IVa were present in 1.6% and 7%, grade IVb were present in 3.2% and 1% in Group I and Group II, respectively. These differences were statistically significant (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Efficacy was comparable between Alken dilator and Amplatz dilator groups. In group I, there were more postoperative fevers >38.5 °C and a higher rate of urosepsis. On the other hand, in group II we observed more pleural injuries. All differences resulted from the type of access to the kidney (inter/infracostal), punctured calyx, and utilization (or not) of access sheath rather than type of dilators itself.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
One dimensional plot of correspondence analysis. Position of squares and circles represent the inertia of variables. The higher coordinate value for Clavien-Dindo grade, the higher likelihood it occurred after Amplatz approach. The lower coordinate value for Clavien-Dindo grade, the higher likelihood it occurred after Alken method.

References

    1. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–82. - PubMed
    1. Liatsikos EN, Hom D, Dinlenz CZ, et al. Tail stent versus re-entry tube: A randomized comparison after percutaneous stone extraction. Urology. 2002;59:15–19. - PubMed
    1. Basiri A, Ahmadnia H, Moghaddam SM. The efficacy of conventional PCNL and two modifications to standard procedure. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56:302–5. - PubMed
    1. Shah HN, Hegde S, Shah JN, et al. A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of fibrin sealant in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2006;176:2488–92. - PubMed
    1. Noller MW, Baughman SM, Morey AF, et al. Fibrin sealant enables tubeless percutaneous stone surgery. J Urol. 2004;172:166–69. - PubMed