Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 14;11(12):e0167372.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167372. eCollection 2016.

Implications of Fine-Grained Habitat Fragmentation and Road Mortality for Jaguar Conservation in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil

Affiliations

Implications of Fine-Grained Habitat Fragmentation and Road Mortality for Jaguar Conservation in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil

Laury Cullen Jr et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Jaguar (Panthera onca) populations in the Upper Paraná River, in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest region, live in a landscape that includes highly fragmented areas as well as relatively intact ones. We developed a model of jaguar habitat suitability in this region, and based on this habitat model, we developed a spatially structured metapopulation model of the jaguar populations in this area to analyze their viability, the potential impact of road mortality on the populations' persistence, and the interaction between road mortality and habitat fragmentation. In more highly fragmented populations, density of jaguars per unit area is lower and density of roads per jaguar is higher. The populations with the most fragmented habitat were predicted to have much lower persistence in the next 100 years when the model included no dispersal, indicating that the persistence of these populations are dependent to a large extent on dispersal from other populations. This, in turn, indicates that the interaction between road mortality and habitat fragmentation may lead to source-sink dynamics, whereby populations with highly fragmented habitat are maintained only by dispersal from populations with less fragmented habitat. This study demonstrates the utility of linking habitat and demographic models in assessing impacts on species living in fragmented landscapes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Our initiative was granted by The Rolex Awards, a prize aimed to recognize outstanding conservation initiatives and is not related to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, marketed products, etc. Thus, this does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Some important protected sites in the study area, along the upper and the lower Paraná River.
The inside frame indicates the location of the study.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Density dependence function used in this model (solid line) and its uncertainty limits used in the sensitivity analysis (dashed lines).
In all models, the proportion of females that are breeding is 50% when population size (N) is small relative to carrying capacity. At carrying capacity, the proportion breeding is 32.9% (which gives an eigenvalue of 1.0; see text for details). The percent breeding declines as N increases, dropping to zero when N = 1.5∙K (1.25 to 1.75 used in the sensitivity analysis).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Radio-collared female jaguar (Panthera onca) roadkill, Morro do Diabo State Park, Brazil.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Spatial structure of jaguar populations identified by the model in the upper Paraná region.
Lighter shading indicates greater habitat suitability as given in Figure A in S1 Appendix. The polygons outline the populations. The population numbers correspond to those in Table 1, and in Figs 5 and 6.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Impact of road mortality on jaguar population persistence: Number of years out of 100 that each population was extant, under no road mortality (0; light gray bars); estimated mortality (1x; dark gray bars); and twice the estimated mortality (2x; black bars).
Fig 6
Fig 6. Effect of dispersal on population persistence: Number of years out of 100 that each population was extant under estimated mortality.
For several populations, model with no dispersal (black bars) resulted in much lower persistence than model with dispersal (gray bars).

References

    1. Sanderson EW, Redford KH, Chetkiewicz CLB, Medellin RA, Rabinowitz AR, Robinson JG, et al. Planning to save a species: The jaguar as a model. Conserv Biol. 2002;16: 58–72. - PubMed
    1. Cattarino L, McAlpine CA, Rhodes JR. The consequences of interactions between dispersal distance and resolution of habitat clustering for dispersal success. Landsc Ecol. 2013;28: 1321–1334.
    1. Rolstad J. Consequences of forest fragmentation for the dynamics of bird populations: conceptual issues and the evidence. Biol Jorrnal Linn Soc. 1991;42: 149–163.
    1. Ims RA, Rolstad J, Wegge P. Predicting space use responses to habitat fragmentation: can voles Microtus oeconomus serve as an experimental model system (EMS) for capercaillie grouse Tetrao urogallus in boreal forest? Biol Conserv. 1993;63: 261–268.
    1. Mona S, Ray N, Arenas M, Excoffier L. Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation during a range expansion. Heredity (Edinb). Nature Publishing Group; 2014;112: 291–9. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources