Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
- PMID: 27974370
- PMCID: PMC5168615
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013742
Should all anticoagulated patients with head injury receive a CT scan? Decision-analysis modelling of an observational cohort
Abstract
Objectives: It is not currently clear whether all anticoagulated patients with a head injury should receive CT scanning or only those with evidence of traumatic brain injury (eg, loss of consciousness or amnesia). We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CT for all compared with selective CT use for anticoagulated patients with a head injury.
Design: Decision-analysis modelling of data from a multicentre observational study.
Setting: 33 emergency departments in England and Scotland.
Participants: 3566 adults (aged ≥16 years) who had suffered blunt head injury, were taking warfarin and underwent selective CT scanning.
Main outcome measures: Estimated expected benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were the entire cohort to receive a CT scan; estimated increased costs of CT and also the potential cost implications associated with patient survival and improved health. These values were used to estimate the cost per QALY of implementing a strategy of CT for all patients compared with observed practice based on guidelines recommending selective CT use.
Results: Of the 1420 of 3534 patients (40%) who did not receive a CT scan, 7 (0.5%) suffered a potentially avoidable head injury-related adverse outcome. If CT scanning had been performed in all patients, appropriate treatment could have gained 3.41 additional QALYs but would have incurred £193 149 additional treatment costs and £130 683 additional CT costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £94 895/QALY gained for unselective compared with selective CT use is markedly above the threshold of £20-30 000/QALY used by the UK National Institute for Care Excellence to determine cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions: CT scanning for all anticoagulated patients with head injury is not cost-effective compared with selective use of CT scanning based on guidelines recommending scanning only for those with evidence of traumatic brain injury.
Trial registration number: NCT 02461498.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02461498.
Keywords: TRAUMA MANAGEMENT; Warfarin.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
AHEAD Study: an observational study of the management of anticoagulated patients who suffer head injury.BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e014324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014324. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28087556 Free PMC article.
-
The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic management strategies for adults with minor head injury.Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 10. Injury. 2012. PMID: 21835403
-
Economic evaluation of the NET intervention versus guideline dissemination for management of mild head injury in hospital emergency departments.Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 5;13(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0834-6. Implement Sci. 2018. PMID: 30518430 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding the management of patients with head injury taking warfarin: who should we scan and when? Lessons from the AHEAD study.Emerg Med J. 2019 Jan;36(1):47-51. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207621. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Emerg Med J. 2019. PMID: 30065073 Review.
-
What is the best imaging strategy for acute stroke?Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jan;8(1):iii, ix-x, 1-180. doi: 10.3310/hta8010. Health Technol Assess. 2004. PMID: 14731377 Review.
Cited by
-
Acute haemorrhage rate in 28,000 Out-of-Hours CT heads.Br J Radiol. 2022 Feb 1;95(1130):20210580. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210580. Epub 2022 Jan 5. Br J Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34928168 Free PMC article.
-
Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Head Trauma and Antithrombotic Therapy.J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 25;8(11):1780. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111780. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31731421 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-centric study for development and validation of a CT head rule for mild traumatic brain injury in direct oral anticoagulants: the HERO-M nomogram.BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 15;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00884-w. BMC Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37840139 Free PMC article.
-
Patients with Prior Craniectomy or Craniotomy Have No Increased Risk of Acute Hemorrhage after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;19(5):2684. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052684. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35270382 Free PMC article.
-
Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients under Anticoagulant Therapy: Review of Management in Emergency Department.J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 24;13(13):3669. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133669. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38999235 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hart RG, Boop BS, Anderson DC. Oral anticoagulants and intracranial hemorrhage. Facts and hypotheses. Stroke 1995;26:1471–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical