Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;31(6):414-420.
doi: 10.5001/omj.2016.84.

Correlation of Intraoperative Frozen Section Report and Histopathological Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors - A Six-Year Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Correlation of Intraoperative Frozen Section Report and Histopathological Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Tumors - A Six-Year Retrospective Study

Radiya Al-Ajmi et al. Oman Med J. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the degree of agreement between the intraoperative frozen section (FS) reporting of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and final histopathological diagnosis based on permanent paraffin section.

Methods: All CNS tumor cases with a diagnosis at FS and subsequent permanent section (n = 261) taken from 2007 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty percent of FS were double-checked by a senior pathologist as part of the study and the intraobserver agreement between the pathologist and the agreement between final report, and initial FS report was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: A total of 261 cases were reviewed. The most common diagnosis was glioblastoma (grade IV) and meningioma (grade I-II) forming 45.6% of cases. Fifty-three cases were subjected to intraobserver agreement of histological diagnosis. There was nearly perfect intraobserver agreement on histopathology (ICC = 0.9). Out of 261 cases, 224 cases showed a strong agreement between the FS diagnosis and final histological diagnosis (ICC = 0.747). A discrepancy between the FS and final diagnosis were found in eight cases. The disagreement did not relate to any specific tumor type. However, in three cases, the discrepancy was in the grading of the glioma. In 29 cases, a definite opinion could not be given on FS as the samples examined were nonrepresentative.

Conclusions: Histopathological slides classified by World Health Organization criteria of CNS tumors had excellent intraobserver agreement. Our results show a moderate to high degree of agreement in the intraoperative diagnosis of CNS lesions using FS. However, there are limitations, and some lesions are a diagnostic challenge. There is a need to improve our diagnostic skills and knowledge of possible errors and establish better communication with neurosurgeons.

Keywords: Central Nervous System; Frozen Sections; Intraoperative Procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Frozen section diagnosed as ependymoma with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, magnification = 200 ×. (b) Paraffin-embedded section diagnosis of choroid plexus papilloma with H&E staining, magnification = 200 ×.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Frozen section diagnosed as a malignant neoplasm with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, magnification = 200 ×. (b) Paraffin-embedded section diagnosis of microcystic meningioma with H&E staining, magnification = 200 ×.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Frozen section diagnosed as small round blue cell tumor with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, magnification = 200 ×. (b) Paraffin-embedded section diagnosis of glioblastoma with H&E staining, magnification =200 ×.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Frozen section diagnosed as suggestive of ependymoma with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, magnification = 200 ×. (b) Paraffin-embedded section diagnosis of medulloblastoma with H&E staining, magnification = 200 ×.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Frozen section diagnosed as low-grade glioma favoring ependymoma with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, magnification = 200 ×. (b) Paraffin-embedded section diagnosis of central neurocytoma with H&E staining, magnification = 200 ×.

References

    1. Rao S, Rajkumar A, Ehtesham MD, Duvuru P. Challenges in neurosurgical intraoperative consultation. Neurol India 2009. Jul-Aug;57(4):464-468. 10.4103/0028-3886.55598 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plesec TP, Prayson RA. Frozen section discrepancy in the evaluation of central nervous system tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007. Oct;131(10):1532-1540. - PubMed
    1. Di Stefano D, Scucchi LF, Cosentino L, Bosman C, Vecchione A. Intraoperative diagnosis of nervous system lesions. Acta Cytol 1998. Mar-Apr;42(2):346-356. 10.1159/000331614 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yachnis AT. Intraoperative consultation for nervous system lesions. Semin Diagn Pathol 2002. Nov;19(4):192-206. - PubMed
    1. Ud Din N, Memon A, Idress R, Ahmad Z, Hasan S. Central nervous system lesions: correlation of intraoperative and final diagnoses, six year experience at a referral centre in a developing country, Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12(6):1435-1437. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources