Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Dec 15;17(1):597.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1688-3.

Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial

Ling Cui et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Fast-track surgery (FTS), also known as enhanced recovery after surgery, is a multidisciplinary approach to accelerate recovery, reduce complications, minimise hospital stay without increasing readmission rates, and reduce health care costs, all without compromising patient safety. The advantages of FTS in abdominal surgery most likely extend to gynaecological surgery, but this is an assumption, as FTS in elective gynaecological surgery has not been well studied. No consensus guidelines have been developed for gynaecological oncological surgery although surgeons have attempted to introduce slightly modified FTS programmes for patients undergoing such surgery. To our knowledge, there are no published randomised controlled trials; however, some studies have shown that FTS in gynaecological oncological surgery leads to early hospital discharge with high levels of patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is whether FTS reduces the length of stay in hospital compared to traditional management. The secondary aim is whether FTS is associated with any increase in post-surgical complications compared to traditional management (for both open and laparoscopic surgery).

Methods/design: This trial will prospectively compare FTS and traditional management protocols. The primary endpoint is the length of post-operative hospitalisation (days, mean ± standard deviation), defined as the number of days between the date of discharge and the date of surgery. The secondary endpoints are complications in both groups (FTS versus traditional protocol) occurring during the first 3 months post-operatively including infection (wound infection, lung infection, intraperitoneal infection), post-operative nausea and vomiting, ileus, post-operative haemorrhage, post-operative thrombosis, and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Enquiry II score.

Discussion: The advantages of FTS most likely extend to gynaecology, although, to our knowledge, there are no randomised controlled trials. The aim of this study is to compare the post-operative length of hospitalisation after major gynaecological or gynaecological oncological surgery and to analyse patients' post-operative complications. This trial may reveal whether FTS leads to early hospital discharge with few complications after gynaecological surgery.

Trial registration number: NCT02687412 . Approval Number: SCCHEC20160001. Date of registration: registered on 23 February 2016.

Keywords: Fast-track surgery; Gynaecological surgery; Oncological surgery; Post-operative length of hospitalisation; Randomised controlled study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Content for the schedule of enrollment, intervention, and assessments
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study flow diagram

References

    1. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995;345:763–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90643-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:189–98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acheson N, Crawford R. The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG. 2011;118:271–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02811.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoong W, Sivashanmugarajan V, Relph S, Bell A, Fajemirokun E, Davies T, et al. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:83–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carter J, Szabo R, Sim WW, Pather S, Philp S, Nattress K, et al. Fast track surgery: a clinical audit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50:159–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01134.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources