Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016:2016:5282470.
doi: 10.1155/2016/5282470. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

Adjunct Intravitreous Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Anti-VEGF Agents

Affiliations

Adjunct Intravitreous Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Anti-VEGF Agents

Robert B Garoon et al. J Ophthalmol. 2016.

Abstract

Aims. To compare visual and anatomic outcomes of adjunct intravitreous (IVT) triamcinolone acetonide to antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections to IVT anti-VEGF injections alone for center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) in treatment-naïve eyes. Methods. Retrospective study of treatment-naïve eyes with center-involving DME. The primary outcome was the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes receiving only IVT anti-VEGF (group 1) and eyes receiving IVT anti-VEGF and adjunct IVT-TA (group 2). Results. Included were 192 eyes. The mean change in BCVA was +3.5 letters in group 1 compared to -3.5 letters in group 2 (p = 0.048). Final macular thickness improved by -94 μm in group 1 versus -68 μm in group 2 (p = 0.26). In group 1, 5/150 eyes compared to 9/42 eyes in group 2 (3.3% versus 21%, p = 0.0005) had a IOP >10 mmHg increase. Six of 126 phakic eyes in group 1 versus 12/33 phakic eyes in group 2 underwent cataract surgery (4.7% versus 36.3%, p = 0.00009). Conclusions. IVT-TA results in no additional benefit in eyes treated with anti-VEGF agents for DME.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moss S. E., Klein R., Klein B. E. K. The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(6):998–1003. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96025-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yau J. W. Y., Rogers S. L., Kawasaki R., et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(3):556–564. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1909. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matthews D. R., Stratton I. M., Aldington S. J., Holman R. R., Kohner E. M. Risks of progression of retinopathy and vision loss related to tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus: UKPDS 69. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2004;122(11):1631–1640. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.11.1631. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: the diabetes control and complications trial. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1995;113(1):36–51. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100010038019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chou T.-H., Wu P.-C., Kuo J. Z.-C., Lai C.-H., Kuo C.-N. Relationship of diabetic macular oedema with glycosylated haemoglobin. Eye. 2009;23(6):1360–1363. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.279. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources