Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;14(11):705-708.

Adverse perinatal outcomes in borderline amniotic fluid index

Affiliations

Adverse perinatal outcomes in borderline amniotic fluid index

Ashraf Jamal et al. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Normal amniotic fluid predicts normal placental function, fetal growth and fetal well-being.

Objective: To determine adverse pregnancy outcomes in borderline amniotic fluid index (AFI).

Materials and methods: Pregnant women (37-40 wks) with diagnosis of borderline AFI between December 2012 and August 2014 were identified. Antepartum, intrapartum and neonatal data were collected and compared with those of pregnant women with normal AFI. An AFI less than 8 and more than 5 cm was defined for borderline AFI. Pregnancy outcomes included Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal heart rate, meconium stained amniotic fluid, 5-min Apgar score <7, low birth weight, umbilical cord blood pH at term and NICU admission.

Results: Gestational age at delivery in pregnancies with borderline AFI was significantly lower than normal AFI. Cesarean section rate for non-reassuring fetal heart rate in women of borderline AFI was significantly higher and there was an increased incidence of birth weight less than 10th percentile for gestation age in borderline AFI group. Incidence of low Apgar score and low umbilical artery pH in pregnancies with borderline AFI was significantly higher than women with normal AFI. There were no significant difference in the rate of NICU admission and meconium staining in both groups.

Conclusion: There are significant differences for adverse pregnancy outcomes , such as Cesarean section due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate, birth weight less than 10th percentile for gestation age, low 5 min Apgar score and low umbilical artery pH between pregnancies with borderline and normal AFI.

Keywords: Borderline Amniotic Fluid Index; Perinatal Outcomes; Pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All contributing authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Modena AB, Fieni S. Amniotic fluid dynamics. Acta Biomed. 2004;75 (Suppl.):11–13. - PubMed
    1. Banks EH, Miller DA. Perinatal risks associated with borderline amniotic fluid index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1461–1463. - PubMed
    1. Kreiser D, el-Sayed YY, Sorem KA, Chitkara U, Holbrook RH Jr, Druzin ML. Decreased amniotic fluid index in low-risk pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 2001;46:743–746. - PubMed
    1. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Hitt WC, Dubil EA, Morrison JC. Borderline or marginal amniotic fluid index and peripartum outcomes: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:523–528. - PubMed
    1. Baron C, Morgan MA, Garite TJ. The impact of amniotic fluid volume assessed intrapartum on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:167–174. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources