Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Feb;27(2):513-521.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2467-7.

Bariatric Surgery or Non-surgical Weight Loss for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension? A Systematic Review and Comparison of Meta-analyses

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Bariatric Surgery or Non-surgical Weight Loss for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension? A Systematic Review and Comparison of Meta-analyses

James H Manfield et al. Obes Surg. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is associated with obesity and weight loss by any means is considered beneficial in this condition.

Objectives: This study aims to appraise bariatric surgery vs. non-surgical weight-loss (medical, behavioural and lifestyle) interventions in IIH management.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analyses of surgical and non-surgical studies.

Results: Bariatric surgery achieved 100% papilloedema resolution and a reduction in headache symptoms in 90.2%. Non-surgical methods offered improvement in papilloedema in 66.7%, visual field defects in 75.4% and headache symptoms in 23.2%. Surgical BMI decrease was 17.5 vs. 4.2 for non-surgical methods.

Conclusions: Whilst both bariatric surgery and non-surgical weight loss offer significant beneficial effects on IIH symptomatology, future studies should address the lack of prospective and randomised trials to establish the optimal role for these interventions.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Benign intracranial hypertension; Idiopathic intracranial hypertension; Metabolic surgery; Obesity; Pseudotumor cerebri; Weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article. Ethical Approval This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed Consent Does not apply.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search strategy flow diagrams for a surgical and b non-surgical studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Headache symptom forest plots for a surgical and b non-surgical studies

References

    1. Radhakrishnan K, Ahlskog JE, Garrity JA, et al., editors. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994; Elsevier. - PubMed
    1. Banik R. Obesity and the role of nonsurgical and surgical weight reduction in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2014;54(1):27–41. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e3182aabf2e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2002;59(10):1492–1495. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000029570.69134.1B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yri HM, Wegener M, Sander B, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension is not benign: a long-term outcome study. J Neurol. 2011;259(5):886–894. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6273-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews LE, Liu GT, Ko MW. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension and obesity. Horm Res Paediatr. 2014;81(4):217–225. - PubMed

MeSH terms