Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
- PMID: 27986368
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.028
Extraprostatic Extension Is Extremely Rare for Contemporary Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Background: A significant proportion of men with Gleason score 6 (GS6) prostate cancer undergo treatment with radiation or surgery.
Objective: To assess pathologic stage of pure GS6 at radical prostatectomy (RP).
Design, setting, and participants: In the period 2003-2014, 7817 patients underwent RP at two institutions. Of 2502 patients with GS6 at surgery, 60 were identified as stage pT3a-b on initial pathologic review, 55 with pT3a (extraprostatic extension, EPE), and five with pT3b (seminal vesicle invasion; SVI). All cases of GS6 with pT3 disease underwent contemporary pathologic evaluation for Gleason grade, stage, and extent of EPE. At one institution, all GS≥7 pT3b cases were re-reviewed for downgrading. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Gleason grading criteria and 2009 ISUP recommendations on pT3 staging were applied.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Calculated incidence (%) of pT3a, pT3b, pT4, and lymph node-positive disease.
Results and limitations: Of the 60 GS6 pT3a-b cases identified in the period 2003-2014, seven (0.28% of entire GS6 cohort) with GS6 and pT3a were identified after re-review, all focal EPE. Among the re-examined cohort, no cases of GS6 with pT3b were observed. None of the 132 GS≥7 pT3b cases were downgraded to GS6. Limitations include partial embedding of specimens and separate pathologic review at each institution.
Conclusions: In a large prostatectomy cohort, GS6 never had seminal vesicle invasion (0%) and was very rarely (0.28%) associated with extraprostatic extension.
Patient summary: GS6 prostate cancer rarely spreads outside the prostate. A new finding in this study was that GS6 prostate cancer never spread to the seminal vesicles.
Keywords: Male; Neoplasm grading; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Seminal vesicles.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic significance and biopsy characteristics of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion on radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based study.Pathology. 2017 Dec;49(7):715-720. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Oct 14. Pathology. 2017. PMID: 29037803
-
Seminal vesicle invasion combined with extraprostatic extension is associated with higher frequency of biochemical recurrence and lymph node metastasis than seminal vesicle invasion alone: Proposal for further pT3 prostate cancer subclassification.Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020 Dec;49:151611. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151611. Epub 2020 Aug 24. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020. PMID: 32956915
-
Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis.Am J Surg Pathol. 1997 Dec;21(12):1496-500. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199712000-00013. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997. PMID: 9414194
-
Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017. PMID: 28177964
-
[International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].Ann Pathol. 2013 Jun;33(3):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 May 29. Ann Pathol. 2013. PMID: 23790653 French.
Cited by
-
Digital versus light microscopy assessment of extraprostatic extension in radical prostatectomy samples.Virchows Arch. 2019 Dec;475(6):735-744. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02666-x. Epub 2019 Oct 7. Virchows Arch. 2019. PMID: 31588959
-
Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model.BMC Cancer. 2020 May 1;20(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06880-8. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32357849 Free PMC article.
-
Should Grade Group 1 (GG1) be called cancer?World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):15-19. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03583-4. Epub 2021 Jan 11. World J Urol. 2022. PMID: 33432506
-
An Apparent Diffusion Coefficient-Based Machine Learning Model Can Improve Prostate Cancer Detection in the Grey Area of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3: A Single-Centre Experience.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;15(13):3438. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133438. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37444548 Free PMC article.
-
How Much Reliable Is the Current Belief on Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer?Pathol Oncol Res. 2021 Apr 13;27:629489. doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.629489. eCollection 2021. Pathol Oncol Res. 2021. PMID: 34257593 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical