Similar articles

• Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.

  Bonomi S, Sala L, Cortinovis U. Bonomi S, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Feb;141(2):312e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004033. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 29068898 No abstract available.
• Reply: Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies.

  Frey JD, Choi M, Salibian AA, Karp NS. Frey JD, et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Feb;141(2):312e-314e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004034. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. PMID: 29068900 No abstract available.
• Nipple Reconstruction After Autologous or Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Multimodal and 3-Dimensional Analysis.

  Tremp M, di Summa PG, Schaakxs D, Oranges CM, Wettstein R, Kalbermatten DF. Tremp M, et al. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Feb;37(2):179-187. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw181. Epub 2016 Dec 16. Aesthet Surg J. 2017. PMID: 27986753
• Breast surgery under local anesthesia: second-stage implant exchange, nipple flap reconstruction, and breast augmentation.

  Koumanis DJ, Colque A, Eisemann ML, Smith J. Koumanis DJ, et al. Clin Plast Surg. 2013 Oct;40(4):583-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2013.08.001. Clin Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 24093654 Review.
• Nipple-sparing mastectomy: an oncologic and cosmetic perspective.

  Laronga C, Smith P. Laronga C, et al. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014 Jul;23(3):549-66. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Apr 26. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014. PMID: 24882350 Review.