Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;15(5):619-630.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies: Surgical Analogues and Mechanisms of Action

Affiliations
Review

Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies: Surgical Analogues and Mechanisms of Action

Pichamol Jirapinyo et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May.

Abstract

Obesity is a worsening pandemic with numerous related comorbid illnesses. Conservative management including lifestyle modification and medications have limited efficacy. In contradistinction, bariatric surgery is effective, however, with substantial cost and non-negligible morbidity and mortality. As such, a small percentage of eligible patients undergo surgery. Over the past decade, endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies have been introduced as a less invasive option for the treatment of obesity and its related comorbid illnesses. This article reviews major endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies, their surgical analogues, and proposed mechanisms of action. Clinical trial data for each device also are discussed.

Keywords: Aspire; Bariatric; Diabetes; Duo; EBMT; EBT; ESG; EndoBarrier; Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty; Endoscopy; GLP-1; Gastric Balloon; Ghrelin; IMAS; Incretin; Magnetic; Metabolic; Obalon; Obesity; Orbera; POSE; PYY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Pichamol Jirapinyo MD

No Conflict of Interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gastric Interventions and Their Surgical Correlates
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gastric Interventions and Their Surgical Correlates (continued)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gastric and Small Bowel Interventions Without Clear Surgical Analogues
Figure 4
Figure 4
Small Bowel Interventions and Their Surgical Correlates

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–814. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C. The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J Health Econ. 2012;31(1):219–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sjöström L, Lindroos A-K, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–2693. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035622. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Obeid NR, Malick W, Concors SJ, et al. Long-term outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10- to 13-year data. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2016;12(1):11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–436. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0. - DOI - PubMed