Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 1;46(3):500-508.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw235.

Age-related references in national public health, technology appraisal and clinical guidelines and guidance: documentary analysis

Affiliations

Age-related references in national public health, technology appraisal and clinical guidelines and guidance: documentary analysis

Lynne F Forrest et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Background: older people may be less likely to receive interventions than younger people. Age bias in national guidance may influence entire public health and health care systems. We examined how English National Institute for Health & Care Excellence (NICE) guidance and guidelines consider age.

Methods: we undertook a documentary analysis of NICE public health (n = 33) and clinical (n = 114) guidelines and technology appraisals (n = 212). We systematically searched for age-related terms, and conducted thematic analysis of the paragraphs in which these occurred ('age-extracts'). Quantitative analysis explored frequency of age-extracts between and within document types. Illustrative quotes were used to elaborate and explain quantitative findings.

Results: 2,314 age-extracts were identified within three themes: age documented as an a-priori consideration at scope-setting (518 age-extracts, 22.4%); documentation of differential effectiveness, cost-effectiveness or other outcomes by age (937 age-extracts, 40.5%); and documentation of age-specific recommendations (859 age-extracts, 37.1%). Public health guidelines considered age most comprehensively. There were clear examples of older-age being considered in both evidence searching and in making recommendations, suggesting that this can be achieved within current processes.

Conclusions: we found inconsistencies in how age is considered in NICE guidance and guidelines. More effort may be required to ensure age is consistently considered. Future NICE committees should search for and document evidence of age-related differences in receipt of interventions. Where evidence relating to effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in older populations is available, more explicit age-related recommendations should be made. Where there is a lack of evidence, it should be stated what new research is needed.

Keywords: NICE guidance; clinical; older-age; public health; technology appraisal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Adamson J, Donovan J, Ben-Shlomo Y, Chaturvedi N, Bowling A. Age and sex interaction in reported help seeking in response to chest pain. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58(550):318–23. doi:10.3399/bjgp08×279670. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Judge A, Welton NJ, Sandhu J, Ben-Shlomo Y. Equity in access to total joint replacement of the hip and knee in England: cross sectional study. Br Med J 2010: 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c4092. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen J, North JB, Wysocki AP, Ware RS, Rey-Conde T. Surgical care for the aged: a retrospective cross-sectional study of a national surgical mortality audit. BMJ Open 2015; 5(5). 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006981. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaturvedi N, Rai H, Ben-Shlomo Y. Lay diagnosis and health care seeking behaviour for chest pain in South Asians and Europeans. Lancet 1997; 350: 1578–83. - PubMed
    1. Elias T, Lowton K. Do those over 80 years of age seek more or less medical help? A qualitative study of health and illness beliefs and behaviour of the oldest old. Sociol Health Illn 2014; 36(7): 970–85. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12129. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms