Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 13;26(3):6085.
doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2016.6085.

Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report

Juliana Araujo Guimarães  1 , Lucas Oliveira da Fonseca  2 , Clarissa Cardoso Dos Santos-Couto-Paz  1 , Antônio Padilha Lanari Bó  2 , Charles Fattal  3 , Christine Azevedo-Coste  4 , Emerson Fachin-Martins  1
Affiliations

Towards Parameters and Protocols to Recommend FES-Cycling in Cases of Paraplegia: A Preliminary Report

Juliana Araujo Guimarães et al. Eur J Transl Myol. .

Abstract

Functional Electrical Stimulation assisted cycling (FES-Cycling) is increasingly becoming an alternative option recommended to people with spinal cord injury struggling with paraplegia and interested in practicing sports. In order to propose preconditions to guide FES-Cycling recommendation, we aimed to investigate some features and their potential relationships with responsiveness to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES). Fourteen volunteers attended a public recruitment forum to be assessed about their responsiveness through the 16-sessions of NMES. Volunteers were separated in two groups (responsive and non-responsive to NMES) which were investigated in the light of some personal, clinical, structural and functional features. Fifty seven percent of the initial sample responded to electrical stimulation with a visual contraction. This responsive group was predominantly composed by subjects presenting traumatic spinal cord injuries above T12 vertebral level. Only two subjects became responsive at the 3rd and 16th sessions. Among the observed features, the etiology and level of injuries seems to be more associated to responsiveness. Our observations seem to indicate that subjects with traumatic spinal cord injury above T12 level were the best potential candidates for FES-cycling.

Keywords: bicycling; electrical stimulation; parathletics; spinal cord.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Sample proportion presenting at least 1/5 contraction during the 16-sessions protocol. Progressive increase into responsiveness may be observed.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Adjustments in the course of the 16-sessions of NMES on the proportions founded for the volunteers who had spinal cord injuries above or inside/below T12 level by groups (responsiveness and non-responsiveness).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gföhler M, Lugner P. Cycling by means of functional electrical stimulation IEEE Transl Rehabil Eng 2000;8:233–43. - PubMed
    1. Perkins TA, Donaldson NN, Hatcher NAC, et al. Control of leg-powered paraplegic cycling using stimulation of the lumbo-sacral anterior spinal nerve roots. IEEE Transl Neur Sys Rehabil Eng 2002;10:158-64. - PubMed
    1. Fornusek C, Davis G. Cardiovascular and metabolic responses during functional electric stimulation cycling at different cadences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:719-25. - PubMed
    1. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. www.asiaspinalinjury.org, available in February, 28th 2016.
    1. Riberto M Miyazaki MH Jucá SSH.et al. . Validation of the Brasilian version of Function Independence Measure. Acta Fisiátrica 2004;11:72-6.

LinkOut - more resources