Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;69(3):218-224.
doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.16.04002-8. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

The impact of semen processing on sperm parameters and pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination

Affiliations

The impact of semen processing on sperm parameters and pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination

Jacob Ruiter-Ligeti et al. Minerva Ginecol. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of semen processing on computer analyzed semen parameters and pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Methods: Over a two-year period, a total of 981 couples undergoing 2231 IUI cycles were evaluated and the freshly collected non-donor semen was analyzed before and after density gradient centrifugation (DGC).

Results: DGC led to significant increases in sperm concentration by 66±74 ×106/mL (P=0.0001), percentage of motile sperm by 24±22% (P=0.0001), concentration motile by 27±58 ×106/mL (P=0.0001), and forward sperm progression by 18±14 µ/s (P=0.0001). In 95% of cases, there was a decrease in the total motile sperm count (TMSC), with an average decrease of 50±124% compared to pre-processed samples (P=0.0001). Importantly, the decrease in TMSC did not negatively affect pregnancy rates (P=0.45).

Conclusions: This study proves that DGC leads to significant increases in most sperm parameters, with the exception of TMSC. Remarkably, the decrease in TMSC did not affect the pregnancy rate. This should reassure clinicians when the TMSC is negatively affected by processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aitken J and Fisher H (1994). “Reactive oxygen species generation and human spermatozoa: the balance of benefit and risk.” Bioessays 16(4): 259–267. - PubMed
    1. Akanji Tijani H and Bhattacharya S (2010). “The role of intrauterine insemination in male infertility.” Hum Fertil (Camb) 13(4): 226–232. - PubMed
    1. Allen NC, Herbert CM 3rd, Maxson WS, Rogers BJ, Diamond MP and Wentz AC (1985). “Intrauterine insemination: a critical review.” Fertil Steril 44(5): 569–580. - PubMed
    1. Badawy A, Elnashar A and Eltotongy M (2009). “Effect of sperm morphology and number on success of intrauterine insemination.” Fertility and Sterility 91(3): 777–781. - PubMed
    1. Boomsma CM, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ and Farquhar C (2007). “Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.” Cochrane Database Syst Rev(4): CD004507. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources