Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;46(1):20160233.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160233. Epub 2016 Dec 18.

Are different imaging methods affecting the treatment decision of extractions of mandibular third molars?

Yifat Manor  1   2 , Refael Abir  3 , Alex Manor  4 , Israel Kaffe  5
Affiliations

Are different imaging methods affecting the treatment decision of extractions of mandibular third molars?

Yifat Manor et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To find the differences between treatment decisions of lower impacted third molars among experts of oral and maxillofacial surgery according to panoramic radiographic and CBCT findings.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 panoramic radiographs and CBCT of lower third molars evaluated for treatment decisions by 9 independent experts of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Results: Differences in interpretation of the panoramic radiography were found between surgeons. The absence of radiological signs suspected for risk to the inferior alveolar nerve lead to the decision of extraction according to panoramic radiography without CBCT (p < 0.01). The presence of those signs lead to referral to CBCT by surgeons before treatment but did not change their decision.

Conclusions: Treatment decision for surgical treatment of the lower third molar can be accepted without CBCT findings. The use of CBCT is popular before extraction of lower third molars. We found that it has a little effect on the treatment decision of the surgical intervention in comparison to panoramic radiography.

Keywords: CBCT; imaging methods; lower third molar extractions; treatment decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Panoramic radiographs of poor quality.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Panoramic radiograph of good quality.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Good-quality CBCT.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Poor-quality CBCT.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: postoperative complication and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc 2007; 73: 325–7. - PubMed
    1. Jerjes W, Swinson B, Moles DR, El-Maaytah M, Banu B, Upile T, et al. Permanent sensory nerve impairment following third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: e1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Visualization of the mandibular canal by different radiographic techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 90–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030207.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 28: 20–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(90)90005-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 276–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.021 - DOI - PubMed