Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 27993418
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.014
Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens for Treating Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Study objective: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used extensively for the management of acute and chronic pain, with ketorolac tromethamine being one of the most frequently used parenteral analgesics in the emergency department (ED). The drugs may commonly be used at doses above their analgesic ceiling, offering no incremental analgesic advantage while potentially adding risk of harm. We evaluate the analgesic efficacy of 3 doses of intravenous ketorolac in ED patients with acute pain.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to assess the analgesic efficacy of 3 doses of intravenous ketorolac (10, 15, and 30 mg) in patients aged 18 to 65 years and presenting to the ED with moderate to severe acute pain, defined by a numeric rating scale score greater than or equal to 5. We excluded patients with peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, renal or hepatic insufficiency, allergies to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, pregnancy or breastfeeding, systolic blood pressure less than 90 or greater than 180 mm Hg, and pulse rate less than 50 or greater than 150 beats/min. Primary outcome was pain reduction at 30 minutes. We recorded pain scores at baseline and up to 120 minutes. Intravenous morphine 0.1 mg/kg was administered as a rescue analgesic if subjects still desired additional pain medication at 30 minutes after the study drug was administered. Data analyses included mixed-model regression and ANOVA.
Results: We enrolled 240 subjects (80 in each dose group). At 30 minutes, substantial pain reduction was demonstrated without any differences between the groups (95% confidence intervals 4.5 to 5.7 for the 10-mg group, 4.5 to 5.6 for the 15-mg group, and 4.2 to 5.4 for the 30-mg group). The mean numeric rating scale pain scores at baseline were 7.7, 7.5, and 7.8 and improved to 5.1, 5.0, and 4.8, respectively, at 30 minutes. Rates of rescue analgesia were similar, and there were no serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes showed similar rates of adverse effects per group, of which the most common were dizziness, nausea, and headache.
Conclusion: Ketorolac has similar analgesic efficacy at intravenous doses of 10, 15, and 30 mg, showing that intravenous ketorolac administered at the analgesic ceiling dose (10 mg) provided effective pain relief to ED patients with moderate to severe pain without increased adverse effects.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
In patients in the emergency department with acute pain, 10, 15, and 30 mg of ketorolac did not differ for pain relief.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 18;166(8):JC44. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2017-166-8-044. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28418546 No abstract available.
-
Comparison of ketorolac dosing in an emergency department setting.CJEM. 2018 Oct;20(S2):S74-S77. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.431. Epub 2018 Feb 8. CJEM. 2018. PMID: 29415787
-
Ceiling Effect Is Not the Only Effect.Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;71(2):265. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.025. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Ann Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29447870 No abstract available.
-
In reply.Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;71(2):266. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.024. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Ann Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29447871 No abstract available.
-
Comparison of Intravenous Ketorolac at Three Single-Dose Regimens.Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;71(2):266-267. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.026. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Ann Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29447872 No abstract available.
-
In reply.Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;71(2):267-268. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.027. Epub 2018 Feb 5. Ann Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29447873 No abstract available.
-
Less is more when it comes to ketorolac for pain.J Fam Pract. 2019 Jan/Feb;68(1):41-42. J Fam Pract. 2019. PMID: 30724903 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
