Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb 23;61(3):e02319-16.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02319-16. Print 2017 Mar.

Nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins: Is There Any Difference between Colistimethate and Polymyxin B?

Affiliations
Review

Nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins: Is There Any Difference between Colistimethate and Polymyxin B?

Alexandre P Zavascki et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Nephrotoxicity is a common adverse effect of the clinically used polymyxins, colistin and polymyxin B. This adverse effect is dose limiting for both polymyxins, as the plasma polymyxin concentrations associated with renal damage overlap those required for antibacterial effect. Since development of acute kidney injury (AKI) during therapy is highly undesirable, it is extremely important to know whether there is any difference between the nephrotoxic potential of colistin (administered as its inefficient prodrug, colistimethate) and polymyxin B (administered as the active form). Both polymyxins are cytotoxic to renal tubular cells and are prone to cause nephrotoxicity in vivo because of the renal handling mechanisms that facilitate accumulation of these compounds in these cells, processes that are reviewed in this article. Also reviewed are the emerging data that strongly suggest significantly higher rates of AKI in patients treated with colistimethate compared to patients treated with polymyxin B. This finding may be due to differences in pharmacokinetics and renal handling mechanisms of colistimethate and formed colistin versus polymyxin B, and consequently the relative amount of polymyxin material delivered to tubular cells. A lower risk of AKI with polymyxin B is one of several potential advantages over colistimethate. The relative safety and efficacy of the two agents require closer examination in well-designed clinical studies.

Keywords: acute kidney injury; colistimethate; colistin; polymyxin B; toxicodynamics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Overview of the pharmacokinetic pathways for CMS (colistimethate) and colistin (left) and polymyxin B (right). The thickness of the arrows indicates the relative magnitude of the respective clearance pathways when kidney function is normal. After administration of CMS, extensive renal excretion of the prodrug occurs with some of the excreted CMS converting to colistin within the kidneys and bladder. As a result, only a relatively small fraction of each CMS dose is converted to colistin within the body. This colistin formed systemically when delivered to the kidneys undergoes extensive tubular reabsorption; the same renal disposition applies to polymyxin B administered as such.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Summary of the overall incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients treated with colistimethate (CMS) or polymyxin B (PMB). AKI was defined as a twofold increase in serum creatinine or an increase of at least 1 mg/dl if initial creatinine was higher than 1.4 mg/dl in the study of Oliveira et al. (36), according to RIFLE criteria in the studies of Akajagbor et al. (37), Phe et al. (34), and Rigatto et al. (39), and according to AKIN criteria in the study of Tuon et al. (38). The incidences of AKI in CMS- and PMB-treated patients, respectively, were 26.0% (10 of 39 patients) and 27.0% (8 of 30) in the study of Oliveira et al. (36), 60.4% (64 of 106) and 41.8% (28 of 67) in the study of Akajagbor et al. (37), 48.2% (40 of 83) and 23.1% (24 of 104) in the cohort without cystic fibrosis patients in the study of Phe et al. (34), 38.9% (14 of 36) and 20.8% (20 of 96) in the study of Tuon et al. (38), and 74.1% (60 of 81) and 46.1% (189 of 410) in the study of Rigatto et al. (39)

References

    1. Nation RL, Velkov T, Li J. 2014. Colistin and polymyxin B: peas in a pod, or chalk and cheese? Clin Infect Dis 59:88–94. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu213. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gales AC, Jones RN, Sader HS. 2011. Contemporary activity of colistin and polymyxin B against a worldwide collection of Gram-negative pathogens: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2006-09). J Antimicrob Chemother 66:2070–2074. doi:10.1093/jac/dkr239. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sader HS, Rhomberg PR, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. 2015. Differences in potency and categorical agreement between colistin and polymyxin B when testing 15,377 clinical strains collected worldwide. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 83:379–381. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.08.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergen PJ, Li J, Rayner CR, Nation RL. 2006. Colistin methanesulfonate is an inactive prodrug of colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1953–1958. doi:10.1128/AAC.00035-06. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnett M, Bushby SR, Wilkinson S. 1964. Sodium sulphomethyl derivatives of polymyxins. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 23:552–574. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1964.tb01610.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms