Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;67(654):e41-e48.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688585. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

GPs' opinions of health assessment instruments for people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study

Affiliations

GPs' opinions of health assessment instruments for people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study

Esther J Bakker-van Gijssel et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Background: GPs provide health care to people with intellectual disabilities (ID). People with ID find it difficult to express themselves concerning health-related matters. Applying health assessments is an effective method to reveal health needs, and can play a role in prevention and health promotion.

Aim: The aim of this qualitative study was to explore GPs' considerations about applying a health assessment for people with ID.

Design and setting: This focus group study was conducted among a selection of Dutch GPs.

Method: An interview guide was developed. All discussions were audiorecorded and transcribed. Analysis was performed using the framework analysis approach. Two researchers independently applied open coding and identified a thematic framework. This framework and the summaries of views per theme were discussed in the research team.

Results: After four focus groups, with 23 GPs, saturation was reached. Three main themes evolved: health assessments in relation to GPs' responsibility; the usefulness and necessity of health assessments; and barriers to using health assessments on people with ID. A health assessment instrument for people with ID can help GPs to focus on certain issues that are not so common in the general population. GPs are motivated to use such a tool if it is scientifically tested, and results in significant health gains. However, GPs identify barriers at the level of GP, patient, and organisation.

Conclusion: Most GPs in the focus groups consider providing medical care to people with ID their responsibility and indicate that a health assessment instrument could be a valuable tool. In order to deliver good care, they need education and support. Many barriers need to be overcome before a health assessment instrument can be implemented.

Keywords: focus groups; general practice; intellectual disability; primary health care; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Definition of ‘intellectual disability’. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/mental... (accessed 28 Nov 2016).
    1. Krahn GL, Hammond L, Turner A. A cascade of disparities: health and healthcare access for people with intellectual disabilities. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2006;12(1):70–82. - PubMed
    1. Carey IM, Shah SM, Hosking FJ, et al. Health characteristics and consultation patterns of people with intellectual disability: a cross-sectional database study in English general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684301. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heslop P, Hoghton M, Blair P, et al. The need for FASTER CARE in the diagnosis of illness in people with intellectual disabilities. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675593. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heslop P, Glover G. Mortality of people with intellectual disabilities in England: a comparison of data from existing sources. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2015;28(5):414–422. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources