The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature
- PMID: 27994295
- PMCID: PMC5136424
- DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.351-353
The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of single bundle and double bundle surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods: In this study, all single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction surgeries that were done in our university hospital from January 2008 to December 2012 were enrolled. All patients were followed at 2,6,12, 24 weeks and 1 a 2 years post operatively. On last follow up all patients were evaluated by clinical examination, KT-1000 and Lysholm questionnaire.
Results: Seventy five patients were operated using single bundle and eighty five patients with double bundle technique. Fifty seven percent of patients in single bundle and 80% of patients in double bundle group had experienced pain during follow-up period. None of cases had knee extension or flexion loss. The average side to side differences using KT-1000 was 3.5 ± 0.38 (2.9-4.1) millimeters in single bundle group and 3.39 ± 0.39 (2.8-4) millimeters in double bundle group. These results showed no significant difference between two groups (P= 0.31). Lysholm score improved significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between them.
Conclusion: According to this study the clinical results of single bundle ACL reconstruction was similar to double bundle reconstruction in short term follow up. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long term results.
Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Double bundle; Lysholm; Patient; Single bundle.
Conflict of interest statement
• Conflict of interest: none declared.
Similar articles
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - Does the Surgeon Risk Worsening of the Clinical Outcome During the Learning Curve if He Switches from Single Bundle Technique to Double Bundle Technique?Z Orthop Unfall. 2016 Oct;154(5):449-456. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111441. Epub 2016 Sep 20. Z Orthop Unfall. 2016. PMID: 27648674 Clinical Trial. English.
-
[Anatomical ACL reconstruction by a double- versus a single-bundle technique. Prospective randomised study of short-term clinical results].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81(1):40-50. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014. PMID: 24755056 Clinical Trial. Czech.
-
Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 5-year results.Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1511-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546512448177. Epub 2012 Jun 11. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22691456 Clinical Trial.
-
ACL reconstruction with double-bundle technique: a review of clinical results.Phys Sportsmed. 2011 Feb;39(1):85-92. doi: 10.3810/psm.2011.02.1865. Phys Sportsmed. 2011. PMID: 21378490 Review.
-
Single-bundle or double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis.Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 8. Knee. 2014. PMID: 23306028 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative Analysis of Web of Science and Pubmed Indexed Medical Journals Published in Former Yugoslav Countries.Med Arch. 2020 Aug;74(4):252-264. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2020.74.252-264. Med Arch. 2020. PMID: 33041441 Free PMC article.
-
Double-Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Study With >1 Year Follow-Up.Cureus. 2023 Aug 1;15(8):e42829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42829. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37664285 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Gentamycin in the Irrigating Solution to Prevent Joint Infection after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction.Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 Jan;7(1):67-74. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019. PMID: 30805418 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Tibial Insertion Site in Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction during Gait Based on Motion Capture and Musculoskeletal Model.J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 26;2022:7596995. doi: 10.1155/2022/7596995. eCollection 2022. J Healthc Eng. 2022. PMID: 35281547 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Outcomes Between All-Inside Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.Malays Orthop J. 2023 Mar;17(1):18-26. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2303.003. Malays Orthop J. 2023. PMID: 37064622 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. British journal of sports medicine. 2011;45(7):596–606. - PubMed
-
- Markatos K, Kaseta MK, Lallos SN, Korres DS, Efstathopoulos N. The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie. 2013;23(7):747–52. - PubMed
-
- Pombo MW, Shen W, Fu FH. Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: where are we today? Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2008;24(10):1168–77. - PubMed
-
- Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, Luetzow WF, Csintalan RP, Phelan D, et al. Prospective trial of a treatment algorithm for the management of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. The American journal of sports medicine. 2005;33(3):335–46. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical