Long-Term Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Ray Threaded Cage for Degenerative Disk Disease: A 20-Year Follow-Up
- PMID: 27994787
- PMCID: PMC5165001
- DOI: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1100
Long-Term Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Stand-Alone Ray Threaded Cage for Degenerative Disk Disease: A 20-Year Follow-Up
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective study.
Purpose: To analyze outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) stand-alone cages.
Overview of literature: PLIF for degenerative disk disease using stand-alone cages has lost its popularity owing to implant-related complications and pseudoarthrosis.
Methods: We analyzed the records of 45 patients (18 women, 27 men), operated between January 1994 and December 1996, with a mean follow-up of 18 years 3 months (20 years 3 months-22 years 3 months). Clinical outcomes were measured using visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Odom's criteria, and radiological measurements of fusion rate, Cobb angle, and implant-related complications conducted at the preoperative evaluation, hospital discharge, 12-month follow-up, and final follow-up.
Results: Preoperative mean VAS (back) was 6.9 and VAS (radicular) was 7.2, with mean improvements (p <0.05) of 2.9 and 3.1, respectively, at the final follow-up. Median preoperative ODI was 64.5, with a mean improvement to 34 and 42 at the 12-month and final follow-ups, respectively (p <0.05). Odom's criteria at the 12-month follow-up were excellent in 11.2% patients, good in 57.7%, fair in 31.1%, and poor in none of the patients; at the final follow-up, no patient was classified as excellent, 71.1% as good, 22.2% as fair, and 6.7% as poor (p <0.05). Pseudoarthrosis was observed in five patients (11.1%), of whom, three (6.6%) required re-operation. Preoperative disk height was 9.23 mm, which increased to 13.33 mm in the immediate postoperative evaluation and was maintained at 10.0 mm at the final follow-up (p <0.05). The preoperative mean L1-S1 Cobb angle was 34.7°, which changed to 44.7° in the immediate postoperative evaluation and dropped to 39.7° at the final follow-up (p <0.005).
Conclusions: PLIF stand-alone cages were associated with good clinical outcomes. Although the fusion rate was excellent, maintenance of disk heights and a lordotic alignment were not achieved in the long term.
Keywords: Degenerative intervertebral disks; Spinal fusion; Stand-alone implants; Treatment outcome.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following stand-alone PLIF surgery using expandable cylindrical threaded cages in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jul;153(7):1409-16; discussion 1416. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1044-z. Epub 2011 May 15. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011. PMID: 21573807
-
Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):623-35. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13569. Epub 2014 Apr 4. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 24702513
-
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone Trabecular Metal cages for repeatedly recurrent lumbar disc herniation and back pain.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):617-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13548. Epub 2014 Mar 28. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 24678638
-
Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.Pain Physician. 2018 Jul;21(4):383-406. Pain Physician. 2018. PMID: 30045595 Clinical Trial.
-
Mid-term Clinical Outcomes of Stand-alone Posterior Interbody Fusion with Rectangular Cages: A 4-year-minimum Follow-up.Korean J Spine. 2013 Sep;10(3):126-32. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2013.10.3.126. Epub 2013 Sep 30. Korean J Spine. 2013. PMID: 24757473 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Is there any advantage of using stand-alone cages? A numerical approach.Biomed Eng Online. 2019 May 22;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0684-8. Biomed Eng Online. 2019. PMID: 31113423 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Different Approaches in Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Spine J. 2022 Feb;16(1):141-149. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0405. Epub 2021 Jan 5. Asian Spine J. 2022. PMID: 33389967 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and risk factors of persistent low back pain following posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for lumbar disk herniation.J Pain Res. 2017 May 4;10:1019-1025. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S132862. eCollection 2017. J Pain Res. 2017. PMID: 28496357 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors and Scoring System of Cage Retropulsion after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Observational Study.Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):855-862. doi: 10.1111/os.12987. Epub 2021 Mar 21. Orthop Surg. 2021. PMID: 33749137 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Park JH, Roh SW. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following stand-alone PLIF surgery using expandable cylindrical threaded cages in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011;153:1409–1416. - PubMed
-
- Oxland TR, Grant JP, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG. Effects of endplate removal on the structural properties of the lower lumbar vertebral bodies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:771–777. - PubMed
-
- DiPaola CP, Molinari RW. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:130–139. - PubMed
-
- Whitecloud TS, 3rd, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord. 2001;14:100–103. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials