Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Mar;88(3):219-225.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0346-3.

[Trust and reliability in surgery]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Trust and reliability in surgery]

[Article in German]
T F Weigel et al. Chirurg. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Social interactions are hardly possible without trust. Medical and in particular surgical actions can change the lives of people directly and indirectly existentially. Thus, the relationship between doctor and patient is a special form of social interaction, and will be hard to find anywhere else. The nature of the doctor-patient relationship also determines the success of a treatment. The core and the importance of trust, as a central part of this relationship, will be reconstructed in the present paper. The increasing possibilities of information acquisition in modern societies, and the ever-present need for transparency, impact more and more on the doctor-patient relationship. At first glance, concepts of trust seem to be of secondary importance. The current developments regarding the remuneration of services in the medical system likewise bear the risk to increasingly determine the importance of trust in the doctor-patient relationship. However, it is necessary to delineate reliability from trust. Due to the conditions which are constitutive for the operational disciplines, a climate of trust, even in a modern information society, is more necessary than ever.

Keywords: Physician-patient relationship; Quality; Reliability; Transparency; Trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1385-8 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2001 Mar 10;357(9258):757-62 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1570-2 - PubMed
    1. Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36(1):35-9 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Oct;17(10):1796-803 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources