A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents
- PMID: 27996923
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251632
A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents
Abstract
Noninvasive, prenatal whole genome sequencing (NIPW) may be a technological reality in the near future, making available a vast array of genetic information early in pregnancy at no risk to the fetus or mother. Many worry that the timing, safety, and ease of the test will lead to informational overload and reproductive consumerism. The prevailing response among commentators has been to restrict conditions eligible for testing based on medical severity, which imposes disputed value judgments and devalues those living with eligible conditions. To avoid these difficulties, we propose an unrestricted testing policy, under which prospective parents could obtain information on any variant of known significance after a careful informed consent process that uses an interactive decision aid to deliver a mandatory presentation on the purposes, techniques, and limitations of genomic testing, as well as optional resources for reflection and consultation. This process would encourage thoughtful, informed deliberation by prospective parents before deciding whether or how to use NIPW.
Keywords: children and families; clinical genetics; decision making; disability; informed consent; reproductive technologies.
Comment in
-
Dr. Pangloss's Clinic: Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing and a Return to Reality.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):21-23. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251660. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996895 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Concerns About Justification for Fetal Genome Sequencing.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):23-25. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251661. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996896 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Breaking the Sounds of Silence: Respecting People With Disabilities and Reproductive Decision Making.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):37-39. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251664. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996901 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Resisting Paternalism in Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):35-37. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251662. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996904 No abstract available.
-
Noninvasive Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: A Solution in Search of a Problem.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):42-44. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251650. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996912 No abstract available.
-
Permissibility or Priority? Testing or Screening? Essential Distinctions in the Ethics of Prenatal Testing.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):30-32. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251658. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996915 No abstract available.
-
Beneficence In Utero: A Framework for Restricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing to Respect and Enhance the Well-Being of Children.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):28-29. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251655. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996917 No abstract available.
-
Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing: An Argument for Professional Self-Regulation.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):26-28. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251653. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996921 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Mandating Moral Reflection?Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):32-34. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251654. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996924 No abstract available.
-
Providing Unrestricted Access to Prenatal Testing Does Not Translate to Enhanced Autonomy.Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jan;17(1):39-41. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251651. Am J Bioeth. 2017. PMID: 27996925 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical