Partiality for Humanity and Enhancement
- PMID: 27997091
- Bookshelf ID: NBK401922
Partiality for Humanity and Enhancement
Excerpt
We consider a strategy for justifying bio-conservative opposition to enhancement according to which we should resist radical departures from human nature, not because human nature possesses any intrinsic value, but because it is our nature. The idea is that we can be partial to humanity in the same way that common sense morality allows us to be partial to self, family, lovers, friends or our country. Whilst a similar idea was suggested by Bernard Williams and Jerry Cohen, it was not fully developed, and their arguments fail to mount a serious challenge to many forms of enhancement. We explore a better approach, drawing on recent literature about the nature and grounds of partiality, and attempt to elucidate what partiality for humanity might plausibly involve. We argue, however, that even if such partiality for humanity is defensible, it can at most only set limits on enhancement.
Copyright 2015, the several contributors.
Sections
References
-
- Annas G. American Bioethics: Crossing Human Rights and Health Law Boundaries. OUP; USA: 2009.
-
- Bostrom N, Ord T. The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics. Ethics. 2006;116:656–679. - PubMed
-
- Buchanan A. Human Nature and Enhancement. Bioethics. 2009;23:141–150.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00633.x - PubMed
-
- Buchanan AE. Beyond humanity? [electronic resource] : the ethics of biomedical enhancement. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2011.
-
- Caney S. Individuals, Nations and Obligations. In: Caney S, George D, Jones P, editors. National Rights, International Obligations. Westview Press; Boulder, Co: 1996.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources