Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0166947.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166947. eCollection 2016.

Terrorism, Radicalisation, Extremism, Authoritarianism and Fundamentalism: A Systematic Review of the Quality and Psychometric Properties of Assessments

Akimi Scarcella  1   2 , Ruairi Page  3 , Vivek Furtado  2   3
Affiliations

Terrorism, Radicalisation, Extremism, Authoritarianism and Fundamentalism: A Systematic Review of the Quality and Psychometric Properties of Assessments

Akimi Scarcella et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Currently, terrorism and suicide bombing are global psychosocial processes that attracts a growing number of psychological and psychiatric contributions to enhance practical counter-terrorism measures. The present study is a systematic review that explores the methodological quality reporting and the psychometric soundness of the instruments developed to identify risk factors of terrorism, extremism, radicalisation, authoritarianism and fundamentalism.

Method: A systematic search strategy was established to identify instruments and studies developed to screen individuals at risk of committing extremist or terrorist offences using 20 different databases across the fields of law, medicine, psychology, sociology and politics. Information extracted was consolidated into two different tables and a 26-item checklist, reporting respectively background information, the psychometric properties of each tool, and the methodological quality markers of these tools. 37 articles met our criteria, which included a total of 4 instruments to be used operationally by professionals, 17 tools developed as research measures, and 9 inventories that have not been generated from a study.

Results: Just over half of the methodological quality markers required for a transparent methodological description of the instruments were reported. The amount of reported psychological properties was even fewer, with only a third of them available across the different studies. The category presenting the least satisfactory results was that containing the 4 instruments to be used operationally by professionals, which can be explained by the fact that half of them refrained from publishing the major part of their findings and relevant guidelines.

Conclusions: A great number of flaws have been identified through this systematic review. The authors encourage future researchers to be more thorough, comprehensive and transparent in their methodology. They also recommend the creation of a multi-disciplinary joint working group in order to best tackle this growing contemporary problem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram of the systematic search strategy for tools predicting and assessing psychological predictors, affinities, and attitudes towards terrorism, extremism, radicalisation and ideas conveyed by those concepts.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pressman DE. Risk Assessment Decision for Violent Political Extremism, 2009–02 SPJ Potocol. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 2009.
    1. Wilner AS, Dubouloz C. Homegrown Terrorism and Transformative Learning: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding Radicalization. Global Change, Peace, and Security. 2010;22(1):33–51.
    1. HM Government. PREVENT Strategy PREVENT Programme. London: The Stationery Office Limited, 2011.
    1. HM Government. Channel Duty Guidance: Protecting Vulnerable People from Being Drawn into Terrorism Guidance. London: The Stationary Office Limited, 2015.
    1. B. H. Inside Terrorism New York: Columbia University Press; 2006.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources