Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 21;18(12):e326.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.6593.

Recruiting Pregnant Patients for Survey Research: A Head to Head Comparison of Social Media-Based Versus Clinic-Based Approaches

Lindsay Admon  1   2 , Jessica K Haefner  2   3 , Giselle E Kolenic  2 , Tammy Chang  3   4 , Matthew M Davis  5 , Michelle H Moniz  2   3
Affiliations

Recruiting Pregnant Patients for Survey Research: A Head to Head Comparison of Social Media-Based Versus Clinic-Based Approaches

Lindsay Admon et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Recruiting a diverse sample of pregnant women for clinical research is a challenging but crucial task for improving obstetric services and maternal and child health outcomes.

Objective: To compare the feasibility and cost of recruiting pregnant women for survey research using social media-based and clinic-based approaches.

Methods: Advertisements were used to recruit pregnant women from the social media website Facebook. In-person methods were used to recruit pregnant women from the outpatient clinic of a large, tertiary care center. In both approaches, potential respondents were invited to participate in a 15-minute Web-based survey. Each recruitment method was monitored for 1 month. Using bivariate statistics, we compared the number, demographic characteristics, and health characteristics of women recruited and the cost per completed survey for each recruitment method.

Results: The social media-based approach recruited 1178 women and the clinic-based approach recruited 219 women. A higher proportion of subjects recruited through social media identified as African American (29.4%, 207/705 vs 11.2%, 20/179), reported household incomes <US $30,000 per year (56.8%, 409/720 vs 25.8%, 47/182), reported being in early pregnancy (18.6%, 135/726 vs 10.4%, 19/183 first trimester), and rated their health as fair or poor (22.2%, 160/722 vs 8.2%, 15/183; all P<.001). A smaller proportion of subjects recruited through social media had earned a college degree (21.3%, 153/717 vs 62.3%, 114/183) and were married or in a domestic partnership (45.7%, 330/722 vs 72.1%, 132/183; all P<.001). Social media-based recruitment costs were US $14.63 per completed survey, compared with US $23.51 for clinic-based recruitment.

Conclusions: Web-based recruitment through a social networking platform is a feasible, inexpensive, and rapid means of recruiting a large, diverse sample of pregnant women for survey research.

Keywords: methods; pregnant women; social media; surveys and questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample Facebook advertisement used for social media–based recruitment of pregnant women.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of inclusion, exclusion, and dropout of pregnant women recruited via social media–based compared to clinic-based approaches.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cost per completed survey among pregnant women recruited via social media–based compared to clinic-based approaches.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arcia A. Facebook advertisements for inexpensive participant recruitment among women in early pregnancy. Health Educ Behav. 2013 Sep 30;41(3):237–241. doi: 10.1177/1090198113504414. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24082026 1090198113504414 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gatny HH, Axinn WG. Willingness to participate in research during pregnancy: race, experience, and motivation. Field methods. 2011 Oct 9;24(2):135–154. doi: 10.1177/1525822X11419819. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22798727 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perrin A, Duggan M. [2016-12-12]. Americans' Internet Access: 2000-2015. 2015 Jun 26. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-201... .
    1. Alexa. [2016-08-31]. How popular is facebook.com? http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/facebook.com .
    1. Amon KL, Campbell AJ, Hawke C, Steinbeck K. Facebook as a recruitment tool for adolescent health research: a systematic review. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14(5):439–447.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.05.049.S1876-2859(14)00186-7 - DOI - PubMed