Diagnostic Changes to DSM-5: The Potential Impact on Juvenile Justice
- PMID: 28003390
Diagnostic Changes to DSM-5: The Potential Impact on Juvenile Justice
Abstract
Legal decision-makers have discretion at every stage of processing in the juvenile justice system, and individual youth characteristics (e.g., a particular psychiatric diagnosis) influence how a youth progresses through the system. As a result, changes in diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) may affect the rates of diagnoses among justice-involved youths and subsequently influence youths' experiences within the justice system. In this article, we identify the diagnoses most likely to exert such influences and review the prevalence of diagnosis and psychiatric disorder symptomatology in justice-involved youths. We highlight the DSM-5 changes in diagnostic criteria for internalizing and externalizing disorders that commonly occur among justice-involved youths and the potential impact of these changes on the rates of diagnoses within this population. Finally, we address the limitations of using psychiatric diagnoses in juvenile justice decision making, including the potential for biasing legal decision-makers and the importance of considering context as part of diagnosis.
© 2016 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Similar articles
-
Understanding the Influence of Mental Health Diagnosis and Gender on Placement Decisions for Justice-Involved Youth.J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jul;46(7):1562-1581. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0572-5. Epub 2016 Sep 26. J Youth Adolesc. 2017. PMID: 27670664
-
Relationship between Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-second version and psychiatric disorders in youths in welfare and juvenile justice institutions in Switzerland.BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 30;16(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1032-1. BMC Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27716175 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off scores of the Massachusetts youth screening instrument-second version in a sample of Swiss youths in welfare and juvenile justice institutions.BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1197-2. BMC Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28178977 Free PMC article.
-
A Research Framework for Understanding the Practical Impact of Family Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System: The Juvenile Justice Family Involvement Model.Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Dec;56(3-4):408-21. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9755-6. Am J Community Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26407854 Review.
-
Adverse childhood experiences among justice-involved youth: Data-driven recommendations for action using the sequential intercept model.Am Psychol. 2021 Feb-Mar;76(2):268-283. doi: 10.1037/amp0000769. Am Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33734794 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Mental Health Symptoms and Delinquency among Court-Involved Youth Referred for Treatment.Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019 Mar;98:312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 9. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019. PMID: 30858647 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials