Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016;13(4):395-402.
doi: 10.1007/s10397-016-0962-4. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

Retention of laparoscopic psychomotor skills after a structured training program depends on the quality of the training and on the complexity of the task

Affiliations

Retention of laparoscopic psychomotor skills after a structured training program depends on the quality of the training and on the complexity of the task

Carlos Roger Molinas et al. Gynecol Surg. 2016.

Abstract

This follow-up RCT was conducted to evaluate laparoscopic psychomotor skills retention after finishing a structured training program. In a first study, 80 gynecologists were randomly allocated to four groups to follow different training programs for hand-eye coordination (task 1) with the dominant hand (task 1-a) and the non-dominant hand (task 1-b) and laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying (task 2) in the Laparoscopic Skills Testing and Training (LASTT) model. First, baseline skills were tested (T1). Then, participants trained task 1 (G1: 1-a and 1-b, G2: 1-a only, G3 and G4: none) and then task 2 (all groups but G4). After training all groups were tested again to evaluate skills acquisition (T2). For this study, 2 years after a resting period, 73 participants were recruited and tested again to evaluate skills retention (T3). All groups had comparable skills at T1 for all tasks. At T2, G1, G2, and G3 improved their skills, but the level of improvement was different (G1 = G2 > G3 > G4 for task 1; G1 = G2 = G3 > G4 for task 2). At T3, all groups retained their task 1 skills at the same level than at T2. For task 2, however, a skill decay was already noticed for G2 and G3, being G1 the only group that retained their skills at the post-training level. Training improves laparoscopic skills, which can be retained over time depending on the comprehensiveness of the training program and on the complexity of the task. For high complexity tasks, full training is advisable for both skills acquisition and retention.

Keywords: Intra-corporeal knot tying; LASTT model; Laparoscopy; Psychomotor; Skills acquisition; Skills retention; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CR Molinas: no conflict of interest. R Campo: no conflict of interest. Funding This study did not receive any funding and was funded by the authors’ own resources.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of participation. HEC ham-eye coordination, DH dominant hand, NDH non-dominant hand, LICK laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Skills for hand-eye coordination with the dominant hand (task 1-a). Participants were randomly allocated to different groups according to the training program (G1, G2, G3, and G4), and the skills were measured before training to evaluate the baseline levels (T1), immediately after training to evaluate skills acquisition (T2), and 2 years later to evaluate skills retention (T3). Median (interquartile range) scores are presented
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Skills for hand-eye coordination with the non-dominant hand (task 1-b). Participants were randomly allocated to different groups according to the training program (G1, G2, G3, and G4), and the skills were measured before training to evaluate the baseline levels (T1), immediately after training to evaluate skills acquisition (T2), and 2 years later to evaluate skills retention (T3). Median (interquartile range) scores are presented
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Skills for laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying (task 2). Participants were randomly allocated to different groups according to the training program (G1, G2, G3, and G4), and the skills were measured before training to evaluate the baseline levels (T1), immediately after training to evaluate skills acquisition (T2), and 2 years later to evaluate skills retention (T3). Median (interquartile range) scores are presented

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Subramonian K, DeSylva S, Bishai P, Thompson P, Muir G. Acquiring surgical skills: a comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery. Eur Urol. 2004;45:346–351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korndorffer JR, Stefanidis D, Scott DJ. Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg. 2006;191:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc. 2004;18:485–494. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9017-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Korndorffer JR, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal R, Hance J, Undre S, Ratnasothy J, Moorthy K, Chang A, Darzi A. Training junior operative residents in laparoscopic suturing is feasible and efficacious. Surgery. 2006;139:729–734. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.12.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources