Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 7:7:575.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00575. eCollection 2016.

HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation - A Balancing Act

Affiliations
Review

HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation - A Balancing Act

Andrea A Zachary et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

HLA matching provides numerous benefits in organ transplantation including better graft function, fewer rejection episodes, longer graft survival, and the possibility of reduced immunosuppression. Mismatches are attended by more frequent rejection episodes that require increased immunosuppression that, in turn, can increase the risk of infection and malignancy. HLA mismatches also incur the risk of sensitization, which can reduce the opportunity and increase waiting time for a subsequent transplant. However, other factors such as donor age, donor type, and immunosuppression protocol, can affect the benefit derived from matching. Furthermore, finding a well-matched donor may not be possible for all patients and usually prolongs waiting time. Strategies to optimize transplantation for patients without a well-matched donor should take into account the immunologic barrier represented by different mismatches: what are the least immunogenic mismatches considering the patient's HLA phenotype; should repeated mismatches be avoided; is the patient sensitized to HLA and, if so, what are the strengths of the patient's antibodies? This information can then be used to define the HLA type of an immunologically optimal donor and the probability of such a donor occurring. A probability that is considered to be too low may require expanding the donor population through paired donation or modifying what is acceptable, which may require employing treatment to overcome immunologic barriers such as increased immunosuppression or desensitization. Thus, transplantation must strike a balance between the risk associated with waiting for the optimal donor and the risk associated with a less than optimal donor.

Keywords: HLA matches; HLA mismatches; donor-specific antibody; immunogenicity; match probability; repeated mismatches; sensitization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gene organization of HLA-DR haplotypes. DR haplotypes have varying numbers of genes, some of which encode a polypeptide chain (filled boxes) and others are pseudogenes that have no detectable product (open boxes). DR molecules are comprised of two polypeptide chains, an α chain and a β chain. All DR haplotypes have a DRA gene that encodes the relatively invariant α chain and a DRB1 gene that encodes the β chain of the DR1-DR18 antigens. Some haplotypes carry an additional gene, DRB3, 4, or 5, that encodes the β chain of the DR52, 53, or 51 molecules, respectively. DR haplotypes can be grouped into families defined by the number of DRB genes present as shown in the diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Opelz G. Correlation of HLA matching with kidney graft survival in patients with or without cyclosporine treatment. Transplantation (1985) 40:240–3.10.1097/00007890-198509000-00003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danovitch GM, Cecka JM. Allocation of deceased donor kidneys: past, present, and future. Am J Kidney Dis (2003) 42:882–90.10.1016/j.ajkd.2003.07.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Opelz G, Wujciak T, Döhler B, Scherer S, Mytilineos J. HLA compatibility and organ transplant survival. Collaborative transplant study. Rev Immunogenet (1999) 1:334–42. - PubMed
    1. Opelz G, Döhler B. Effect of human leukocyte antigen compatibility on kidney graft survival: comparative analysis of two decades. Transplantation (2007) 84:137–43.10.1097/01.tp.0000269725.74189.b9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Su X, Zenios SA, Chakkera H, Milford EL, Chertow GM. Diminishing significance of HLA matching in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant (2004) 4:1501–8.10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00535.x - DOI - PubMed