Arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation (ASA) versus open Latarjet to treat recurrent anterior shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: clinical comparison of two series
- PMID: 28004306
- DOI: 10.1007/s12306-016-0446-8
Arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation (ASA) versus open Latarjet to treat recurrent anterior shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: clinical comparison of two series
Abstract
Purpose: The treatment of chronic anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss is still debated. The purpose of this study is to compare short-term results of two techniques treating chronic shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: bone block according to open Latarjet-Patte procedure and arthroscopic Bankart repair in association with subscapularis augmentation.
Methods: Ninety-one patients with moderate anterior glenoid bone loss underwent from 2011 to 2015. From these patients, two groups of 20 individuals each have been selected. The groups were homogeneous in terms of age, gender, dominance and glenoid bone loss. In group A, an open Latarjet procedure has been performed, and in group B, an arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation has been performed. The mean follow-up in group A was 21 months (20-39 months), while in group B was 20 months (15-36 months). QuickDash score, Constant and Rowe shoulder scores, were used for evaluations of results.
Results: The mean preoperative rate of QuickDash score was 3.6 for group A and 4.0 for group B; Rowe Score was 50.0 for group A and 50.0 for group B. Preoperative mean Constant score was 56.2 for Latarjet-Patte and 55.2 for Bankart plus ASA. Postoperative mean QuickDash score was in group A 1.8 and 1.7 in group B; Rowe Score was 89.8 and 91.6; Constant Score was 93.3 and 93.8. No complications related to surgery have been observed for both procedures. Not statistically significant difference was reported between the two groups (p > .05). Postoperatively, the mean deficit of external rotation in ER1 was -9° in group A and -8 in group B; In ER2, the mean deficit was -5° in both groups (p = .0942).
Conclusions: Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation of Bankart repair is an effective procedure for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss without any significant difference in comparison with the well-known open Latarjet procedure.
Keywords: Anterior shoulder instability; Arthroscopic Bankart repair; Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation; Glenoid bone loss; Open Latarjet–Patte procedure.
Similar articles
-
Borderline Glenoid Bone Defect in Anterior Shoulder Instability: Latarjet Procedure Versus Bankart Repair.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2170-2176. doi: 10.1177/0363546518776978. Epub 2018 Jun 7. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29879363
-
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205. doi: 10.1177/0363546516658037. Epub 2016 Aug 8. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27501835
-
Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation of Bankart Repair in Chronic Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bone Loss Less Than 25% and Capsular Deficiency: Clinical Multicenter Study.Arthroscopy. 2017 May;33(5):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Nov 19. Arthroscopy. 2017. PMID: 27876488
-
Arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage versus Latarjet procedure for management of engaging Hill-Sachs lesions with subcritical glenoid bone loss in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Oct;29(10):2163-2174. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.032. Epub 2020 Jun 9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020. PMID: 32807370
-
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Comparison to Bone Block Augmentation for Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):706-717. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.033. Epub 2020 Sep 7. Arthroscopy. 2021. PMID: 32911004
Cited by
-
Case Report: A complex congenital bilateral multidirectional glenohumeral hyperlaxity with instability: surgical, anatomical, and forensic insights.Front Surg. 2025 Jun 2;12:1578404. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1578404. eCollection 2025. Front Surg. 2025. PMID: 40529889 Free PMC article.
-
Intra-articular Versus Extra-articular Coracoid Grafts: A Systematic Review of Capsular Repair Techniques During the Latarjet Procedure.Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 25;10(1):23259671211068371. doi: 10.1177/23259671211068371. eCollection 2022 Jan. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35097145 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating the results of Bankart repair in recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.Int J Burns Trauma. 2021 Aug 15;11(4):337-343. eCollection 2021. Int J Burns Trauma. 2021. PMID: 34557337 Free PMC article.
-
Transglenoid Fixation Technique for Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation Using an Adjustable-Length Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Device.Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Aug 21;12(9):e1555-e1563. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.04.032. eCollection 2023 Sep. Arthrosc Tech. 2023. PMID: 37780664 Free PMC article.
-
A study on Subscapularis augmented Bankart repair (SB) vs capsulo-labral Bankart repair (CB) for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with moderate glenoid bone loss (< 20 %) in non-athletepopulation.J Orthop. 2023 Oct 14;46:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.005. eCollection 2023 Dec. J Orthop. 2023. PMID: 37928049 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical