Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;21(2):66-73.
doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0251. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

A Report on Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Inherited Retinal Dystrophies by Targeted Genetic Analyses

Affiliations

A Report on Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Inherited Retinal Dystrophies by Targeted Genetic Analyses

Hema L Ramkumar et al. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: To test the utility of targeted sequencing as a method of clinical molecular testing in patients diagnosed with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD).

Methods: After genetic counseling, peripheral blood was drawn from 188 probands and 36 carriers of IRD. Single gene testing was performed on each patient in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certified laboratory. DNA was isolated, and all exons in the gene of interest were analyzed along with 20 base pairs of flanking intronic sequence. Genetic testing was most often performed on ABCA4, CTRP5, ELOV4, BEST1, CRB1, and PRPH2. Pathogenicity of novel sequence changes was predicted by PolyPhen2 and sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT).

Results: Of the 225 genetic tests performed, 150 were for recessive IRD, and 75 were for dominant IRD. A positive molecular diagnosis was made in 70 (59%) of probands with recessive IRD and 19 (26%) probands with dominant IRD. Analysis confirmed 12 (34%) of individuals as carriers of familial mutations associated with IRD. Thirty-two novel variants were identified; among these, 17 sequence changes in four genes were predicted to be possibly or probably damaging including: ABCA4 (14), BEST1 (2), PRPH2 (1), and TIMP3 (1).

Conclusions: Targeted analysis of clinically suspected genes in 225 subjects resulted in a positive molecular diagnosis in 26% of patients with dominant IRD and 59% of patients with recessive IRD. Novel damaging mutations were identified in four genes. Single gene screening is not an ideal method for diagnostic testing given the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity among IRD cases. High-throughput sequencing of all genes associated with retinal degeneration may be more efficient for molecular diagnosis.

Keywords: DNA testing; inherited retinal degeneration; molecular diagnosis; retinal dystrophy; retinitis pigmentosa; targeted genetic testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report no competing financial interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L. (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7:248–249 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alapati A, Goetz K, Suk J, et al. (2014) Molecular diagnostic testing by eyeGENE: analysis of patients with hereditary retinal dystrophy phenotypes involving central vision loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:5510–5521 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amano T, Sagai T, Tanabe H, et al. (2009) Chromosomal dynamics at the Shh locus: limb bud-specific differential regulation of competence and active transcription. Dev Cell 16:47–57 - PubMed
    1. Braun TA, Mullins RF, Wagner AH, et al. (2013) Non-exomic and synonymous variants in ABCA4 are an important cause of Stargardt disease. Hum Mol Genet 22:5136–5145 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Briggs CE, Rucinski D, Rosenfeld PJ, et al. (2001) Mutations in ABCR (ABCA4) in patients with Stargardt macular degeneration or cone-rod degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:2229–2236 - PubMed

MeSH terms