Determinants of Healthcare Utilisation and Out-of-Pocket Payments in the Context of Free Public Primary Healthcare in Zambia
- PMID: 28005549
- PMCID: PMC5144876
- DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.65
Determinants of Healthcare Utilisation and Out-of-Pocket Payments in the Context of Free Public Primary Healthcare in Zambia
Abstract
Background: Access to appropriate and affordable healthcare is needed to achieve better health outcomes in Africa. However, access to healthcare remains low, especially among the poor. In Zambia, poor access exists despite the policy by the government to remove user fees in all primary healthcare facilities in the public sector. The paper has two main objectives: (i) to examine the factors associated with healthcare choices among sick people, and (ii) to assess the determinants of the magnitude of out-of-pocket (OOP) payments related to a visit to a health provider.
Methods: This paper employs a multilevel multinomial logistic regression to model the determinants of an individual's choice of healthcare options following an illness. Further, the study analyses the drivers of the magnitude of OOP expenditure related to a visit to a health provider using a two-part generalised linear model. The analysis is based on a nationally representative healthcare utilisation and expenditure survey that was conducted in 2014.
Results: Household per capita consumption expenditure is significantly associated with increased odds of seeking formal care (odds ratio [OR] = 1.12, P = .000). Living in a household in which the head has a higher level of education is associated with increased odds of seeking formal healthcare (OR = 1.54, P = .000) and (OR = 1.55, P = .01), for secondary and tertiary education, respectively. Rural residence is associated with reduced odds of seeking formal care (OR = 0.706, P = .002). The magnitude of OOP expenditure during a visit is significantly dependent on household economic well-being, distance from a health facility, among other factors. A 10% increase in per capita consumption expenditure was associated with a 0.2% increase in OOP health expenditure while every kilometre travelled was associated with a K0.51 increase in OOP health expenditure.
Conclusion: Despite the removal of user fees on public primary healthcare in Zambia, access to healthcare is highly dependent on an individual's socio-economic status, illness type and region of residence. These findings also suggest that the benefits of free public healthcare may not reach the poorest proportionately, which raise implications for increasing access in Zambia and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa.
Keywords: Access to Healthcare; Expenditure; Health; Removal of User Fees; Zambia.
© 2016 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Similar articles
-
Does User Fee Removal Policy Provide Financial Protection from Catastrophic Health Care Payments? Evidence from Zambia.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 21;11(1):e0146508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146508. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26795620 Free PMC article.
-
Hardship financing of out-of-pocket payments in the context of free healthcare in Zambia.PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0214750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214750. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30969979 Free PMC article.
-
Determining household out of pocket payments, incidence of catastrophic expenditures and impoverishment among patients with malaria in Zambia's path towards Universal Health Coverage.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 10;19(12):e0312906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312906. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39656710 Free PMC article.
-
What are the economic consequences for households of illness and of paying for health care in low- and middle-income country contexts?Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(4):858-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.001. Epub 2005 Aug 15. Soc Sci Med. 2006. PMID: 16099574 Review.
-
Strategies for reducing out of pocket payments in the health system: a scoping review.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Aug 4;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00301-8. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021. PMID: 34348717 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Informal payments for primary health services in Zambia: Evidence from a health facility patient exit survey.Health Policy Open. 2020 Nov 9;1:100020. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100020. eCollection 2020 Dec. Health Policy Open. 2020. PMID: 37383307 Free PMC article.
-
Low and unequal use of outpatient health services in public primary health care facilities in southern Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06846-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34362376 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Implementing a Free Delivery Service Policy on Women's Utilization of Facility-Based Delivery in Central Ethiopia: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.J Pregnancy. 2020 Dec 12;2020:8649598. doi: 10.1155/2020/8649598. eCollection 2020. J Pregnancy. 2020. PMID: 33414963 Free PMC article.
-
Insured clients out-of-pocket payments for health care under the national health insurance scheme in Ghana.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 8;21(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06401-8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 33964911 Free PMC article.
-
Out-of-pocket expenditure for home and facility-based delivery among rural women in Zambia: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study.Int J Womens Health. 2019 Aug 1;11:411-430. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S214081. eCollection 2019. Int J Womens Health. 2019. PMID: 31447591 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Human Development Network, The World Bank. The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy: Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Edition. Seattle, WA: IHME; 2013.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources