Physiological and pathophysiological aspects of incretin hormones and glucagon

Abstract

Infusion of oxyntomodulin and the separate and combined infusion of GLP-1 and glucagon inhibited food intake similarly in healthy individuals, with no superior effect of combining GLP-1 and glucagon. We confirm the inhibitory effects of oxyntomodulin and GLP-1, respectively, on GE and appetite scores observed previously, but by adding glucagon to the infusion of GLP-1 we found no additive effects. Unexpectedly, glucagon alone had no effect on GE and appetite scores, but inhibited food intake to the same extent as oxyntomodulin, GLP-1 and GLP-1 + glucagon. Both the GLP-1, oxyntomodulin and GLP-1 + glucagon infusions appeared to increase O₂ compared to saline but this observation is most likely confounded by a residual meal-induced thermogenesis because the calorimetry was performed relatively soon after the paracetamol peak indicating that a considerable volume still resided in the stomach and a high rate of nutrient absorption probably was still going on compared to the saline infusion. Flint et al previously concluded from a protocol very similar to ours using GLP-1 infusions, that the observed increases in energy expenditure most likely were linked to the meal. In contrast, we observed no significant changes in O₂ from baseline in any of the experiments in our study. The lack of a clear effect on O₂ is in contrast to recently reported findings regarding infusions of glucagon and GLP-1. But the dose of glucagon used in that particular study was more than 15-fold higher than ours and associated with large changes in glucose and insulin levels. Such levels are likely to influence REE and offer an explanation of the reported additive effect of combinations of GLP-1 and glucagon. Our conclusion is consistent with recent findings showing no increases after short-term native GLP-1 infusions. Long-term treatment with the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide using 24 h chamber calorimetry has so far shown no differences in energy expenditure following the treatment. Surprisingly, the infusion of glucagon did not change gastric emptying. This finding is controversial since glucagon previously has been used to inhibit bowel motility. However, the doses used to inhibit bowel motility were more than 3,000-fold higher than the dose used in the present study and as mentioned above, such doses might activate the GLP-1 receptor pathway. Interestingly, the glucagon infusion did result in decreased food intake to the same extent as the other peptide infusions despite having no impact on gastric emptying and appetite scores. We found a mean 180 kcal (120 g) difference in food intake following infusions of all the peptides compared to saline. This would roughly sum up to a body weight loss of 402 g of fat per week, which is in the range of what previously has been found in overweight and obese humans with the injection of oxyntomodulin.