The long-term results and changing patterns of biological valves at the mitral position in contemporary practice in Japan
- PMID: 28008192
- PMCID: PMC5159462
- DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.78.4.369
The long-term results and changing patterns of biological valves at the mitral position in contemporary practice in Japan
Abstract
Mitral valve surgery has changed with the wide acceptance of mitral valve repair. The aim of this study is to obtain the long-term results of patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) using a biological prosthesis in contemporary practice in Japan. From January 1990 to December 2013, 76 patients underwent MVR using a biological prosthesis with or without concomitant surgery. Data were obtained by means of a questionnaire and a telephone interview. The mean follow-up period was 4.26 years. The etiologies of the patients included dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (n=20 [26.3%]), ischemic mitral regurgitation (n=7 [9.2%]). There is a trend towards decreasing number of rheumatic and degenerative disease and increasing number of DCM and ischemic mitral regurgitation. Three patients (3.9%) died in the perioperative period. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 69.6% and 31.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year freedom from valve related death were 95.6% and 80.6 %, respectively. The linearized rates of valve-related complications were as follows: thromboembolism (0.63%/patient/year), bleeding (1.25%/patient/year). One patient underwent reoperation for structural degeneration 13 years after the first operation. The present study shows the long-term results of mitral valve replacement with bioproshtesis in a contemporary case series. The practice pattern is changing. The low rate of valve-related complication justify the current patient selection.
Keywords: Imitral valve replacement; biological prosthesis; long-term results.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of the carbomedics prosthesis: experience at providence health system in Portland.J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Nov;11(6):844-50. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002. PMID: 12479287 Clinical Trial.
-
Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jul;36(1):84-90; discussion 90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.048. Epub 2009 Apr 14. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19369085
-
Outcomes and associated risk factors for mitral valve replacement in children.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Sep;40(3):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.060. Epub 2011 Feb 25. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21353791
-
[The best of valvular heart disease in 2006].Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2007 Jan;100 Spec No 1:19-28. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2007. PMID: 17405561 Review. French.
-
Long-term results of mitral valve repair.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Oct;1(2):203-10. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989. PMID: 2488424 Review.
References
-
- Northrup WF, 3rd, Kshettry VR, DuBois KA. Trends in mitral valve surgery in a large multi-surgeon, multi-hospital practice, 1979–1999. J Heart Valve Dis, 2003; 12: 14–24. - PubMed
-
- Marchand MA, Aupart MR, Norton R, Goldsmith IR, Pelletier LC, Pellerin M, et al. Fifteen-year experience with the mitral Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg, 2001; 71: S236–239. - PubMed
-
- Jamieson WR, Gudas VM, Burr LH, Janusz MT, Fradet GJ, Ling H, et al. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2009; 35: 104–110. - PubMed
-
- Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Grunkemeier GL, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008; 135: 732–738. - PubMed
-
- Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation, 1995; 91: 1022–1028. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources