Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Surgeon Perceptions and Cost-Benefit Trade-Off Analysis
- PMID: 28008574
- PMCID: PMC5374165
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5717-y
Use of Tumor Markers in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Surgeon Perceptions and Cost-Benefit Trade-Off Analysis
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal cancers constitute the third most common cancers worldwide. Tumor markers have long since been used in the postoperative surveillance of these malignancies; however, the true value in clinical practice remains undetermined.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of three tumor markers in colorectal and esophagogastric cancer.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to elicit the sensitivity, specificity, statistical heterogeneity and ability to predict recurrence and metastases for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 and CA125. European surgeons were surveyed to assess their current practice and the characteristics of tumor markers they most valued. Data from the included studies and survey were combined in a cost-benefit trade-off analysis to assess which tumor markers are of most use in clinical practice.
Results: Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were ranked the most desirable characteristics of a tumor marker by those surveyed. Overall, 156 studies were included to inform the cost-benefit trade-off. The cost-benefit trade-off showed that CEA outperformed both CA19-9 and CA125, with lower financial cost and a higher sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy for metastases at presentation (area under the curve [AUC] 0.70 vs. 0.61 vs. 0.46), as well as similar diagnostic accuracy for recurrence (AUC 0.46 vs. 0.48).
Conclusions: Cost-benefit trade-off analysis identified CEA to be the best performing tumor marker. Further studies should seek to evaluate new tumor markers, with investigation tailored to factors that meet the requirements of practicing clinicians.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16545207
-
What carcinoembryonic antigen level should trigger further investigation during colorectal cancer follow-up? A systematic review and secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Health Technol Assess. 2017 Apr;21(22):1-60. doi: 10.3310/hta21220. Health Technol Assess. 2017. PMID: 28617240 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jun;10(18):iii-iv, xi-259. doi: 10.3310/hta10180. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16729917
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17999840
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
Cited by
-
Quantitative Detection of Gastrointestinal Tumor Markers Using a Machine Learning Algorithm and Multicolor Quantum Dot Biosensor.Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;2022:9022821. doi: 10.1155/2022/9022821. eCollection 2022. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36093502 Free PMC article.
-
Biomarkers of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer.Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 27;15:1457612. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1457612. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39399490 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Relation to CA-125 and CA 19-9 Expression.J Evid Based Integr Med. 2023 Jan-Dec;28:2515690X231198315. doi: 10.1177/2515690X231198315. J Evid Based Integr Med. 2023. PMID: 37654084 Free PMC article.
-
Label-free electrochemical biosensor based on AuNPs and PCL-b-PHEAA amphiphilic copolymer for highly sensitive detection of CEA.Mikrochim Acta. 2025 Mar 5;192(4):207. doi: 10.1007/s00604-025-07063-7. Mikrochim Acta. 2025. PMID: 40045070
-
Exosomal Long Non-Coding RNA CEBPA-AS1 Inhibits Tumor Apoptosis and Functions as a Non-Invasive Biomarker for Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.Onco Targets Ther. 2020 Feb 14;13:1365-1374. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S238706. eCollection 2020. Onco Targets Ther. 2020. PMID: 32110038 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Cancer Institute. SEER stat fact sheets. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2015.
-
- Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Louhimo J, Stenman UH, Alfthan H, Haglund C. CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 improve the diagnostic accuracy in gastrointestinal cancers. Anticancer Res. 2002;22(4):2311–2316. - PubMed
-
- Yang XQ, Chen C, Wang FB, Peng CW, Li Y. Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen19-9 and carbohydrate antigen 125 as prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival in colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(5):1251–1256. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous