Microsurgery for Spetzler-Ponce Class A and B arteriovenous malformations utilizing an outcome score adopted from Gamma Knife radiosurgery: a prospective cohort study
- PMID: 28009228
- DOI: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS161275
Microsurgery for Spetzler-Ponce Class A and B arteriovenous malformations utilizing an outcome score adopted from Gamma Knife radiosurgery: a prospective cohort study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to adapt and apply the extended definition of favorable outcome established for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) to surgery for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). The aim was to derive both an error around the point estimate and a model incorporating angioarchitectural features in order to facilitate comparison among different treatments. METHODS A prospective microsurgical cohort was analyzed. This cohort included patients undergoing embolization who did not proceed to microsurgery and patients denied surgery because of perceived risk of treatment. Data on bAVM residual and recurrence during long-term follow-up as well as complications of surgery and preoperative embolization were analyzed. Patients with Spetzler-Ponce Class C bAVMs were excluded because of extreme selection bias. First, patients with a favorable outcome were identified for both Class A and Class B lesions. Patients were considered to have a favorable outcome if they were free of bAVM recurrence or residual at last follow-up, with no complication of surgery or preoperative embolization, and a modified Rankin Scale score of more than 1 at 12 months after treatment. Patients who were denied surgery because of perceived risk, but would otherwise have been candidates for surgery, were included as not having a favorable outcome. Second, the authors analyzed favorable outcome from microsurgery by means of regression analysis, using as predictors characteristics previously identified to be associated with complications. Third, they created a prediction model of favorable outcome for microsurgery dependent upon angioarchitectural variables derived from the regression analysis. RESULTS From a cohort of 675 patients who were either treated or denied surgery because of perceived risk of surgery, 562 had Spetzler-Ponce Class A or B bAVMs and were included in the analysis. Logistic regression for favorable outcome found decreasing maximum diameter (continuous, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.76), the absence of eloquent location (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.12-0.43), and the absence of deep venous drainage (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.10-0.36) to be significant predictors of favorable outcome. These variables are in agreement with previous analyses of microsurgery leading to complications, and the findings support the use of favorable outcome for microsurgery. The model developed for angioarchitectural features predicts a range of favorable outcome at 8 years following microsurgery for Class A bAVMs to be 88%-99%. The same model for Class B bAVMs predicts a range of favorable outcome of 62%-90%. CONCLUSIONS Favorable outcome, derived from GKRS, can be successfully used for microsurgical cohort series to assist in treatment recommendations. A favorable outcome can be achieved by microsurgery in at least 90% of cases at 8 years following microsurgery for patients with bAVMs smaller than 2.5 cm in maximum diameter and, in the absence of either deep venous drainage or eloquent location, patients with Spetzler-Ponce Class A bAVMs of all diameters. For patients with Class B bAVMs, this rate of favorable outcome can only be approached for lesions with a maximum diameter just above 6 cm or smaller and without deep venous drainage or eloquent location.
Keywords: AVM = arteriovenous malformation; CTA = CT angiography; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; GKRS = Gamma Knife radiosurgery; MRA = MR angiography; RCT = randomized controlled trial; VRAS = Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Scale; arteriovenous malformation; bAVM = brain AVM; brain; cohort study; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; stereotactic radiosurgery; surgery; vascular disorders.
Comment on
-
A practical grading scale for predicting outcome after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: analysis of 1012 treated patients.J Neurosurg. 2013 Oct;119(4):981-7. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.JNS1311. Epub 2013 Jul 5. J Neurosurg. 2013. PMID: 23829820
-
Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort.J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):36-44. doi: 10.3171/2015.9.JNS151311. Epub 2016 Mar 4. J Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 26943847
Similar articles
-
Deliberate employment of postoperative hypotension for brain arteriovenous malformation surgery and the incidence of delayed postoperative hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study.J Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;127(5):1025-1040. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161333. Epub 2016 Dec 16. J Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 27982772
-
Surgery for unruptured arteriovenous malformations of the brain is better than conservative management for selected cases: a prospective cohort study.J Neurosurg. 2014 Oct;121(4):878-90. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132691. Epub 2014 Aug 8. J Neurosurg. 2014. PMID: 25105704
-
Microsurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: subgroup outcomes in a consecutive series of 288 cases.J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;126(4):1056-1063. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS153017. Epub 2016 Jun 10. J Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 27285541 Clinical Trial.
-
Critical review of brain AVM surgery, surgical results and natural history in 2017.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Aug;159(8):1457-1478. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3217-x. Epub 2017 May 29. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017. PMID: 28555270 Review.
-
Microsurgery Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Treatment of Patients With Brain Arteriovenous Malformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosurgery. 2023 Sep 1;93(3):510-523. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002460. Epub 2023 Mar 31. Neurosurgery. 2023. PMID: 36999929
Cited by
-
Reporting of angiographic studies in patients diagnosed with a cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review.F1000Res. 2024 Nov 25;12:1252. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.139256.3. eCollection 2023. F1000Res. 2024. PMID: 39931157 Free PMC article.
-
The Application of the Novel Grading Scale (Lawton-Young Grading System) to Predict the Outcome of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation.Neurosurgery. 2019 Feb 1;84(2):529-536. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy153. Neurosurgery. 2019. PMID: 29733392 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing health-related quality of life in modified Rankin Scale grades: 15D results from 323 patients with brain arteriovenous malformation and population controls.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jul;163(7):2037-2046. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04847-7. Epub 2021 Apr 16. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021. PMID: 33860377 Free PMC article.
-
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline.Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 1;87(3):442-452. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa004. Neurosurgery. 2020. PMID: 32065836 Free PMC article.
-
Chinese Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery Society and Chinese Interventional & Hybrid Operation Society, of Chinese Stroke Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in Eloquent Areas.Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 9;12:651663. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.651663. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 34177760 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources