Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;265(1):97-102.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001645.

Patient-reported Limitations to Surgical Buy-in: A Qualitative Study of Patients Facing High-risk Surgery

Michael J Nabozny  1 , Jacqueline M Kruser, Nicole M Steffens, Kristen E Pecanac, Karen J Brasel, Eva H Chittenden, Zara Cooper, Martin F McKneally, Margaret L Schwarze
Affiliations

Patient-reported Limitations to Surgical Buy-in: A Qualitative Study of Patients Facing High-risk Surgery

Michael J Nabozny et al. Ann Surg. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To characterize how patients buy-in to treatments beyond the operating room and what limits they would place on additional life-supporting treatments.

Background: During a high-risk operation, surgeons generally assume that patients buy-in to life-supporting interventions that might be necessary postoperatively. How patients understand this agreement and their willingness to participate in additional treatment is unknown.

Methods: We purposively sampled surgeons in Toronto, Ontario, Boston, Massachusetts, and Madison, Wisconsin, who are good communicators and routinely perform high-risk operations. We audio-recorded their conversations with patients considering high-risk surgery. For patients who were then scheduled for surgery, we performed open-ended preoperative and postoperative interviews. We used directed qualitative content analysis to analyze the interviews and surgeon visits, specifically evaluating the content about the use of postoperative life support.

Results: We recorded 43 patients' conversations with surgeons, 34 preoperative, and 27 postoperative interviews. Patients expressed trust in their surgeon to make decisions about additional treatments if a serious complication occurred, yet expressed a preference for significant treatment limitations that were not discussed with their surgeon preoperatively. Patients valued the existence or creation of an advance directive preoperatively, but they did not discuss this directive with their surgeon. Instead they assumed it would be effective if needed and that family members knew their wishes.

Conclusions: Patients implicitly trust their surgeons to treat postoperative complications as they arise. Although patients may buy-in to some additional postoperative interventions, they hold a broad range of preferences for treatment limitations that were not discussed with the surgeon preoperatively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient recruitment and enrollment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL, et al. Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:853–860. - PubMed
    1. Danjoux Meth N, Lawless B, Hawryluck L. Conflicts in the ICU: perspectives of administrators and clinicians. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:2068–2077. - PubMed
    1. Larochelle MR, Rodriguez KL, Arnold RM, et al. Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatment intensity. Palliat Med. 2009;23:460–470. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Burns JP, et al. Conflict in the care of patients with prolonged stay in the ICU: types, sources, and predictors. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:1489–1497. - PubMed
    1. Lemiale V, Kentish-Barnes N, Chaize M, et al. Health-related quality of life in family members of intensive care unit patients. J Palliat Med. 2010;13:1131–1137. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms