Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr:61:113-124.
doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

Assessing local capacity to expand rural breast cancer screening and patient navigation: An iterative mixed-method tool

Affiliations

Assessing local capacity to expand rural breast cancer screening and patient navigation: An iterative mixed-method tool

Stephen J Inrig et al. Eval Program Plann. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Despite federal funding for breast cancer screening, fragmented infrastructure and limited organizational capacity hinder access to the full continuum of breast cancer screening and clinical follow-up procedures among rural-residing women. We proposed a regional hub-and-spoke model, partnering with local providers to expand access across North Texas. We describe development and application of an iterative, mixed-method tool to assess county capacity to conduct community outreach and/or patient navigation in a partnership model.

Methods: Our tool combined publicly-available quantitative data with qualitative assessments during site visits and semi-structured interviews.

Results: Application of our tool resulted in shifts in capacity designation in 10 of 17 county partners: 8 implemented local outreach with hub navigation; 9 relied on the hub for both outreach and navigation. Key factors influencing capacity: (1) formal linkages between partner organizations; (2) inter-organizational relationships; (3) existing clinical service protocols; (4) underserved populations. Qualitative data elucidate how our tool captured these capacity changes.

Conclusions: Our capacity assessment tool enabled the hub to establish partnerships with county organizations by tailoring support to local capacity and needs. Absent a vertically integrated provider network for preventive services in these rural counties, our tool facilitated a virtually integrated regional network to extend access to breast cancer screening to underserved women.

Keywords: Access to care; Breast cancer screening; Evaluation design and research; Service capacity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
BSPAN Program Service Area
Figure 2
Figure 2
BSPAN Program Logic Model
Figure 3
Figure 3
Breast Cancer Screening Process Model
Figure 4
Figure 4
County Capacity Assessment Process

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander JA, Christianson JB, Hearld LR, Hurley R, Scanlon DP. Challenges of Capacity Building in Multisector Community Health Alliances. Health Education & Behavior. 2010;37:645–664. - PubMed
    1. Alexander JA, Weiner BJ, Metzger ME, Shortell SM, Bazzoli GJ, Hasnain-Wynia, et al. Sustainability of collaborative capacity in community health partnerships. Medical Care Research & Review. 2003;60:130s–160s. - PubMed
    1. Allard SW, Roth B. Strained Suburbs: The Social Service Challenges of Rising Suburban Poverty, Publishing. Washington DC: 2010.
    1. Allen SM, Ballweg RA, Cosgrove EM, Engle KA, Robinson LR, Rosenblatt RA, et al. Challenges and opportunities in building a sustainable rural primary care workforce in alignment with the Affordable Care Act: the WWAMI program as a case study. Academic Medicine. 2013;88:1862–1869. - PubMed
    1. American College of Radiology. [accessed 10/27/14];Accredited Facility Search by Modality: Breast MRI. 2015 http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Accreditation/Accredited-Facility-Search.

MeSH terms