Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 1;33(3):505-514.
doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw086.

Citizen Science for public health

Affiliations

Citizen Science for public health

Lea Den Broeder et al. Health Promot Int. .

Abstract

Community engagement in public health policy is easier said than done. One reason is that public health policy is produced in a complex process resulting in policies that may appear not to link up to citizen perspectives. We therefore address the central question as to whether citizen engagement in knowledge production could enable inclusive health policy making. Building on non-health work fields, we describe different types of citizen engagement in scientific research, or 'Citizen Science'. We describe the challenges that Citizen Science poses for public health, and how these could be addressed. Despite these challenges, we expect that Citizen Science or similar approaches such as participatory action research and 'popular epidemiology' may yield better knowledge, empowered communities, and improved community health. We provide a draft framework to enable evaluation of Citizen Science in practice, consisting of a descriptive typology of different kinds of Citizen Science and a causal framework that shows how Citizen Science in public health might benefit both the knowledge produced as well as the 'Citizen Scientists' as active participants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Effects of Citizen Science on health, health governance and knowledge system.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abelson J., Forest P. G., Eyles J., Smith P., Martin E., Gauvin F. P. (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 239–251. - PubMed
    1. Alameda County Public Health Department (2013). Getting on Board for Health: A Health Impact Assessment of Bus Funding and Access. Oakland.
    1. Australian Indigenous Doctors’ Association and Centre for Health Equity Training, R. a. E. U. (2010) Health impact assessment of the northern territory emergency response. Canberra.
    1. Bonney R., Cooper C., Dickinson J., Kelling S., Phillips T., Rosenberg K.. et al. (2009) Citizen Science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59, 977–984.
    1. Bonney R., Shirk J. L., Phillips T. B., Wiggins A., Ballard H. L., Miller-Rushing A. J.. et al. (2014) Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343, 1436–1437. - PubMed