Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):386-394.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003550. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

Refractory status epilepticus in children with and without prior epilepsy or status epilepticus

Affiliations
Observational Study

Refractory status epilepticus in children with and without prior epilepsy or status epilepticus

Iván Sánchez Fernández et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE) management and outcome in children with and without a prior diagnosis of epilepsy and with and without a history of status epilepticus (SE).

Methods: This was a prospective observational descriptive study performed from June 2011 to May 2016 on pediatric patients (1 month-21 years of age) with rSE.

Results: We enrolled 189 participants (53% male) with a median (25th-75th percentile) age of 4.2 (1.3-9.6) years. Eighty-nine (47%) patients had a prior diagnosis of epilepsy. Thirty-four (18%) patients had a history of SE. The time to the first benzodiazepine was similar in participants with and without a diagnosis of epilepsy (15 [5-60] vs 16.5 [5-42.75] minutes, p = 0.858). Patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy received their first non-benzodiazepine (BZD) antiepileptic drug (AED) later (93 [46-190] vs 50.5 [28-116] minutes, p = 0.002) and were less likely to receive at least one continuous infusion (35/89 [39.3%] vs 57/100 [57%], p = 0.03). Compared to patients with no history of SE, patients with a history of SE received their first BZD earlier (8 [3.5-22.3] vs 20 [5-60] minutes, p = 0.0073), although they had a similar time to first non-BZD AED (76.5 [45.3-124] vs 65 [32.5-156] minutes, p = 0.749). Differences were mostly driven by the patients with an out-of-hospital rSE onset.

Conclusions: Our study establishes that children with rSE do not receive more timely treatment if they have a prior diagnosis of epilepsy; however, a history of SE is associated with more timely administration of abortive medication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cumulative probability curves representing time to receive medications for status epilepticus (SE) comparing patients with and without epilepsy
The left column represents the time to receive the first benzodiazepine (BZD), the middle column the time to receive the first non-BZD antiepileptic drug (AED), and the right column the time to receive the first continuous infusion (CI). (A) Whole population. (B) Onset of SE out of the hospital. (C) Onset of SE in the hospital. X-axis arbitrarily truncated at 150 minutes (time to first BZD), at 200 minutes (time to first non-BZD AED), and at 800 minutes (time to first CI) for clarity (outliers not shown in the figure, but evaluated for its calculation).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cumulative probability curves representing time to receive medications for status epilepticus (SE) comparing patients with and without a history of SE
The left column represents the time to receive the first benzodiazepine (BZD), the middle column the time to receive the first non-BZD antiepileptic drug (AED), and the right column the time to receive the first continuous infusion (CI). (A) Whole population. (B) Onset of SE out of the hospital. (C) Onset of SE in the hospital. X-axis arbitrarily truncated at 150 minutes (time to first BZD), at 200 minutes (time to first non-BZD AED), and at 800 minutes (time to first CI) for clarity (outliers not shown in the figure, but evaluated for its calculation).

References

    1. Chin RF, Neville BG, Peckham C, et al. Incidence, cause, and short-term outcome of convulsive status epilepticus in childhood: prospective population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:222–229. - PubMed
    1. Dham BS, Hunter K, Rincon F. The epidemiology of status epilepticus in the United States. Neurocrit Care 2014;20:476–483. - PubMed
    1. Hesdorffer DC, Logroscino G, Cascino G, Annegers JF, Hauser WA. Incidence of status epilepticus in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965-1984. Neurology 1998;50:735–741. - PubMed
    1. Penberthy LT, Towne A, Garnett LK, Perlin JB, DeLorenzo RJ. Estimating the economic burden of status epilepticus to the health care system. Seizure 2005;14:46–51. - PubMed
    1. Strzelczyk A, Knake S, Oertel WH, Rosenow F, Hamer HM. Inpatient treatment costs of status epilepticus in adults in Germany. Seizure 2013;22:882–885. - PubMed

Substances