Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov-Dec;62(6):816-827.
doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

Management of high-risk corneal transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Management of high-risk corneal transplantation

Antonio Di Zazzo et al. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

The cornea is the most commonly transplanted tissue in medicine. The main cause of corneal graft failure is allograft rejection. The incidence of graft rejection depends on the presence of high-risk characteristics, most notably corneal neovascularization. Although corneal grafting has high success rates in the absence of these risk factors, high-risk keratoplasty is associated with low success rates because of a high incidence of immune-mediated graft rejection. To improve the survival of high-risk corneal transplantation, various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative measures can be considered; however, the key step in the management of these grafts is the long-term use of local and/or systemic immunosuppressive agents. Although a number of immunosuppressive agents have been used for this purpose, the results vary significantly across different studies. This is partly due to the lack of an optimized method for their use, as well as the lack of a precise stratification of the degree of risk in each individual patient. New targeted biologic treatments, as well as tolerance-inducing methods, show promising horizons in the management of high-risk corneal transplantation in near future.

Keywords: cornea; graft rejection; high-risk; immunosuppression; neovascularization; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: none

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
High-risk corneas with different degrees of corneal neovascularization: mild (A), in a patient with corneal scar after infectious keratitis; moderate (B), in a patient with longstanding bullous keratopathy; and severe (C), in a patient with the failure of the third corneal graft with associated ocular surface inflammation.

References

    1. Ababneh OH, AlOmari AF. Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty With Imported Corneas Compared With Local Corneas. Cornea. 2016;35(9):1211–1215. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000942. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abudou M, Wu T, Evans JR, Chen X. Immunosuppressants for the prophylaxis of corneal graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(8):CD007603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007603.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agarwal S, Angayarkanni N, Iyer G, et al. Clinico-biochemical correlation of the effect of subconjunctival bevacizumab for corneal neovascularization. Cornea. 2014;33(10):1016–1021. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allison AC, Eugui EM. Mycophenolate mofetil and its mechanisms of action. Immunopharmacology. 2000;47(2–3):85–118. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10878285. - PubMed
    1. Amouzegar A, Chauhan SK, Dana R. Alloimmunity and Tolerance in Corneal Transplantation. J Immunol. 2016;196(10):3983–3991. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600251. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms