Comparison of stent versus medical therapy for symptomatic patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of intracranial stent implantation and medical therapy for treatment of severe intracranial stenosis.

Methods: Articles were identified from Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar published up to August 25, 2016. Eligible studies reported stroke occurrence, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and event-free survival rates in patients who suffered recent TIA or stroke caused by stenosis of a major intracranial artery and treated with either medical therapy or stenting. 4 studies enrolled a total 739 patients.

Results: While no association between intracranial endovascular therapy and short-term stroke risk was found (pooled OR=1.349, 95% CI=0.541 to 3.367, P=0.521), significantly higher rate of stroke occurrence was observed in patients treated with stent therapy within 30days of treatment (pooled OR=3.143, 95% CI=1.755 to 5.628, P<0.001). No association was found between the type of treatment and TIA occurrence (pooled OR=0.702, 95% CI=0.277 to 1.781, P=0.457) and event-free survival rate (pooled HR=1.170, 95% CI=0.947 to 1.447, P=0.145).

Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis undergoing stent therapy may have higher risk of short-term stroke.

Keywords: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis; Medical therapy; Stent.