Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec:2:603-612.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.07.005.

A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing parents' vaccination decision-making in the United Kingdom

Alice S Forster  1 , Lauren Rockliffe  1 , Amanda J Chorley  1 , Laura A V Marlow  1 , Helen Bedford  2 , Samuel G Smith  3 , Jo Waller  1
Affiliations
Review

A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing parents' vaccination decision-making in the United Kingdom

Alice S Forster et al. SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: High uptake of vaccinations is crucial for disease prevention. Although overall uptake of childhood immunisations is high in the United Kingdom (UK), pockets of lower uptake remain. Novel systematic methods have not been employed when reviewing the qualitative literature examining parents' vaccination decisions.

Aims: We aimed to conduct a qualitative systematic review of studies in the UK to understand factors influencing parental decisions to vaccinate a child.

Methods: On 12/2/14 we searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL plus, Embase, Social Policy and Practice and Web of Science for studies using qualitative methods and reporting reasons why parents in the UK had or had not immunised their child. Participant quotes and authors' interpretations of qualitative data were extracted from the results of articles. Thematic synthesis was used to develop higher-order themes (conducted in 2015).

Results: 34 papers were included. Two types of decision-making had been adopted: non-deliberative and deliberative. With non-deliberative decisions parents felt they had no choice, were happy to comply and/or relied on social norms. Deliberative decisions involved weighing up the risks and benefits, considering others' advice/experiences and social judgement. Emotions affected deliberative decision-making. Trust in information and vaccine stakeholders was integral to all decision-making. Practical issues affected those who intended to vaccinate.

Conclusions: Parents adopted two different approaches to decision-making about childhood vaccinations. By understanding more about the mechanisms underpinning parents' vaccination behaviour, in collaboration with vaccine stakeholders, we can better design interventions to enhance informed uptake.

Keywords: Parents; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Thematic synthesis; Vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of included studies, adapted from Moher et al. (2009).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Themes identified and relationships between themes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Samad L., Tate A.R., Dezateux C., Peckham C., Butler N., Bedford H. Differences in risk factors for partial and no immunisation in the first year of life: prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal. 2006;332(7553):1312–1313. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marlow L.A., Waller J., Wardle J. Sociodemographic predictors of HPV testing and vaccination acceptability: results from a population-representative sample of British women. Journal of Medical Screening. 2008;15(2):91–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gordon D., Waller J., Marlow LA. Attitudes to HPV vaccination among mothers in the British Jewish community: reasons for accepting or declining the vaccine. Vaccine. 2011;29(43):7350–7356. - PubMed
    1. Barnett-Page E., Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2009;9:59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosch F.X., Tsu V., Vorsters A., Van Damme P., Kane M.A. Reframing cervical cancer prevention. Expanding the field towards prevention of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases. Vaccine. 2012;30(Suppl. 5):F1–F11. - PubMed