Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1989 Oct;140(4):1001-6.
doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.4.1001.

Random variation in tuberculin sensitivity in schoolchildren. Serial skin testing before and after preventive treatment for tuberculosis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Random variation in tuberculin sensitivity in schoolchildren. Serial skin testing before and after preventive treatment for tuberculosis

M K Felten et al. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Oct.

Abstract

Schoolchildren were Mantoux-tested with 2 TU freeze-dried PPD RT23, and the strong reactors with indurations of 14.0 mm or more were selected for treatment with one of three different fixed drug combinations containing isoniazid or with placebo for 2 to 6 months. The initial tuberculin test was repeated after 8, 14, and 27 months. Of the 8,934 black schoolchildren initially tested, 5,165 did not react to the skin test, 2,898 had indurations up to 14.0 mm, and 871 reacted strongly. Of these strong reactors, 808 were allocated to four preventive treatment groups. On completion of treatment, the mean tuberculin reaction for all groups was significantly decreased. Because the placebo group showed changes similar to those seen in the other treatment groups, the tuberculin skin test is probably not suitable for monitoring the success of preventive therapy. Differences between skin test results before and after treatment when retesting only strong reactors are caused by a combination of effects that are difficult to distinguish. Assuming random variation in tuberculin sensitivity, the decrease can be explained as a combined effect of regression to the mean and some boosting. The increased reaction sizes in the subsequent Mantoux tests are explained by the booster phenomenon and possibly by reinfection. When using a cutting point for deriving a positive reactor, the chance of being selected for preventive treatment may depend primarily on the moment in time when the test is done. Thus, all reactors with no recent BCG vaccination should equally be considered for treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources