Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb:36:7-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

Considerations when choosing a genetic model organism for metabolomics studies

Affiliations
Review

Considerations when choosing a genetic model organism for metabolomics studies

Laura K Reed et al. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Model organisms are important in many areas of chemical biology. In metabolomics, model organisms can provide excellent samples for methods development as well as the foundation of comparative phylometabolomics, which will become possible as metabolomics applications expand. Comparative studies of conserved and unique metabolic pathways will help in the annotation of metabolites as well as provide important new targets of investigation in biology and biomedicine. However, most chemical biologists are not familiar with genetics, which needs to be considered when choosing a model organism. In this review we summarize the strengths and weaknesses of several genetic systems, including natural isolates, recombinant inbred lines, and genetic mutations. We also discuss methods to detect targets of selection on the metabolome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sources of interesting biological variation that contribute to observable phenotypes
The components of a system in a population of organisms include: genetic variation (hard coded genetic information in DNA), the epigenome (controls on how and when the genetic information is expressed), the transcriptome (all of the RNA gene transcripts), the proteome (the complete set of proteins translated and subsequently modified from the RNA transcripts), the metabolome (all the small molecule chemical compounds from both endogenous and exogenous sources). To understand complex traits, including disease, ultimately we have to understand each “omics” level, how it evolves, and the mechanisms by which it can be perturbed. Phenotypic variation derives not only from genetic variation but also from the environment that can introduce both predictable and random perturbation (lightning bolts) of the physiological system. Metabolic homeostasis is achieved through interactions between different physiological or “omics” levels within an organism, including regulatory feedback (curved arrows) and the fitness effects on the evolutionary genetics of the species. Each physiological level is likely to have a distinct reaction to environmental perturbation thus have to be understood as part of a larger system to predict the phenotypic consequence.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The genetic basis for variation in the metabolome can be identified by several strategies
The metabolome is symbolized here by small colored nodes for metabolites with edges between the nodes indicating a gene function that links two metabolites (e.g an enzyme). The color of the larger circles containing the metabolome represents the phenotype of the organism. A. A natural population exhibits inter-individual variation in the structure of their metabolomes and resulting phenotypes due to a combination genotype (α, β, or γ) and environmental (1, 2, or 3) effects. B. The relative contribution of genotype and environment to metabolome variation can be identified by systematically testing the distinct genotypes (α, β, and γ) across each of the three environments. This can be a powerful way to map the genes contributing to metabolome variation in natural isolates and recombinant inbred lines (RILs). C. Systematic mutation of the genes (red X) contributing to the metabolome can identify which are most critical to maintaining the organism's phenotype when compared to the wildtype (α) genetic control (e.g. orange vs blue phenotype). D. Artificial selection exposes a genetically variable population to a selective force such as a novel environment that selects for a phenotype and underlying metabolome controlled by particular genes. By analyzing how the metabolome network adapts one can identify especially important components (e.g. new connection between the blue and orange metabolites). E. Mutation accumulation (MA) experiments allow a wildtype progenitor genotype (α) to progressively acquire mutations that are largely deleterious. The comparison between the wildtype and MA lines allows for the identification of especially critical genetic controls and the overall robustness of the metabolome (e.g. blue vs pink phenotypes).

References

    1. Beger RD, Dunn W, Schmidt MA, Gross SS, Kirwan JA, Cascante M, Brennan L, Wishart DS, Oresic M, Hankemeier T, et al. Metabolomics enables precision medicine: "A White Paper, Community Perspective". Metabolomics. 2016;12:149. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams S, Dew-Budd K, Davis K, Anderson J, Bishop R, Freeman K, Davis D, Bray K, Perkins L, Hubickey J, et al. Metabolomic and Gene Expression Profiles Exhibit Modular Genetic and Dietary Structure Linking Metabolic Syndrome Phenotypes in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda) 2015;5:2817–2829. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reed LK, Lee K, Zhang Z, Rashid L, Poe A, Hsieh B, Deighton N, Glassbrook N, Bodmer R, Gibson G. Systems genomics of metabolic phenotypes in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2014;197:781–793. In one of the first studies to simultaneously quantify the natural genetic and environmental (dietary) contribution to variation in the metabolome, this study found that one major axes of variation in the metabolome in larvae (PC2) was predictive of the heart disease risk in adult flies. In addition, they found that the relative effect of diet on the metabolome was substantially larger than the diet effect on the transcriptome.

    1. Williams C, Watanabe M, Guarracino M, Ferraro M, Edison A, Morgan T, Boroujerdi A, Hahn D. Cold adaptation shapes the robustness of metabolic networks in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 2014;68:3505–3523. Drosophila populations were selected for increased and decreased chill-coma recovery times, an important physiological trait in the wild. They found that flies with reduced chill-coma time exhibited a metabolic network that was more robust to perturbation by cold. The metabolites affected by selection for cold tolerance included those involved in membrane lipid synthesis and amino acid metabolism, thus identifying pathways that may be targets of selection in the wild.

    1. Stupp GS, Clendinen CS, Ajredini R, Szewc MA, Garrett T, Menger RF, Yost RA, Beecher C, Edison AS. Isotopic ratio outlier analysis global metabolomics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Analytical Chemistry. 2013;85:11858–11865. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources