Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1989 Aug;33(8):1212-6.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.8.1212.

Single-dose cefuroxime axetil versus multiple-dose cefaclor in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Single-dose cefuroxime axetil versus multiple-dose cefaclor in the treatment of acute urinary tract infections

A Iravani et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug.

Abstract

Eighty-nine college women with acute urinary tract infections were treated orally with either 1,000 mg of cefuroxime axetil in a single dose (n = 59) or 250 mg of cefaclor three times a day for 7 days (n = 30). At 1 week posttherapy, 88% of the patients in the cefuroxime axetil group and 97% in the cefaclor group were clinically and bacteriologically cured (P greater than 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference between the cure rates of the two treatment groups. However, this study has only a 50% power to detect a 10% difference. Therefore, there is a substantial possibility of a type II error, i.e., failing to find a difference that is actually present. At 4 weeks posttherapy, 78% of the patients in the cefuroxime group and 80% in the cefaclor group remained cured. By 36 weeks posttherapy, the cumulative rate of recurrence in both treatment groups was 60%. Of the patients with a positive antibody-coated bacteria test, fewer achieved a short-term cure after single-dose treatment with cefuroxime axetil than those with a negative antibody-coated bacteria test (67 versus 96%; P less than 0.01).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Jan-Feb;4(1):29-34 - PubMed
    1. Med J Aust. 1980 May 17;1(10):489 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Apr;18(4):174-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1967 Aug 26;2(7513):427-8 - PubMed
    1. Public Health. 1975 Sep;89(6):287-96 - PubMed

MeSH terms