Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 1;37(5):1312-1319.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2858-16.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

Decoding the Cortical Dynamics of Sound-Meaning Mapping

Affiliations

Decoding the Cortical Dynamics of Sound-Meaning Mapping

Ece Kocagoncu et al. J Neurosci. .

Abstract

Comprehending speech involves the rapid and optimally efficient mapping from sound to meaning. Influential cognitive models of spoken word recognition (Marslen-Wilson and Welsh, 1978) propose that the onset of a spoken word initiates a continuous process of activation of the lexical and semantic properties of the word candidates matching the speech input and competition between them, which continues until the point at which the word is differentiated from all other cohort candidates (the uniqueness point, UP). At this point, the word is recognized uniquely and only the target word's semantics are active. Although it is well established that spoken word recognition engages the superior (Rauschecker and Scott, 2009), middle, and inferior (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007) temporal cortices, little is known about the real-time brain activity that underpins the computations and representations that evolve over time during the transformation from speech to meaning. Here, we test for the first time the spatiotemporal dynamics of these processes by collecting MEG data while human participants listened to spoken words. By constructing quantitative models of competition and access to meaning in combination with spatiotemporal searchlight representational similarity analysis (Kriegeskorte et al., 2006) in source space, we were able to test where and when these models produced significant effects. We found early transient effects ∼400 ms before the UP of lexical competition in left supramarginal gyrus, left superior temporal gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus (MTG), and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and of semantic competition in MTG, left angular gyrus, and IFG. After the UP, there were no competitive effects, only target-specific semantic effects in angular gyrus and MTG.

Significance statement: Understanding spoken words involves complex processes that transform the auditory input into a meaningful interpretation. This effortless transition occurs on millisecond timescales, with remarkable speed and accuracy and without any awareness of the complex computations involved. Here, we reveal the real-time neural dynamics of these processes by collecting data about listeners' brain activity as they hear spoken words. Using novel statistical models of different aspects of the recognition process, we can locate directly which parts of the brain are accessing the stored form and meaning of words and how the competition between different word candidates is resolved neurally in real time. This gives us a uniquely differentiated picture of the neural substrate for the first 500 ms of word recognition.

Keywords: MEG; MVPA; cohort; competition; searchlight; semantics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Model RDMs tested in the current analysis where rows and columns of the matrices represent trials (i.e., single spoken words) and values indicate pairwise dissimilarity values across trials. A, LexComp model. B, SemComp model. C, SemDis model. D and E represent cohort activations of two example stimuli taken from the gating results: chicken and train. Cohort profiles indicate the change in activation of every candidate word over time. D, At word onset, all members in chicken's cohort are partially activated, resulting in high lexical competition. As more of the speech input is heard, the activation of competitor words decays and the target word's activation increases. E, Train's cohort profile shows high semantic competition due to low semantic overlap between the cohort candidates. Arrows mark the UPs.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A, Language mask used in the current analysis. The mask consists of bilateral IFG, MTG, STG, SMG, AG, and LATL. B, Diagram depicting how the data RDMs are correlated with the model RDMs for each searchlight. Note that the data RDMs change at every time point, whereas the model RDMs remain static. This procedure was repeated for every searchlight and model RDM.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
ssRSA results displaying the corrected t-maps every 100 ms. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. UP is marked by the red border.

References

    1. Apfelbaum KS, Blumstein SE, McMurray B (2011) Semantic priming is affected by real-time phonological competition: Evidence for continuous cascading systems. Psychon Bull Rev 18:141–149. 10.3758/s13423-010-0039-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baayen R, Piepenbrock R, van Rijn H (1993) The CELEX lexical data base on CD-Rom. Linguistic Data Consortium. Release 1 CD-ROM. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
    1. Baroni M, Lenci A (2010) Distributional memory: a general framework for corpus-based semantics. Computational Linguistics 36:673–721. 10.1162/coli_a_00016 - DOI
    1. Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL (2009) Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 19:2767–2796. 10.1093/cercor/bhp055 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonnici HM, Richter FR, Yazar Y, Simons JS (2016) Multimodal feature integration in the angular gyrus during episodic and semantic retrieval. J Neurosci 36:5462–5471. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4310-15.2016 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources