The global decline of cheetah Acinonyx jubatus and what it means for conservation
- PMID: 28028225
- PMCID: PMC5255576
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1611122114
The global decline of cheetah Acinonyx jubatus and what it means for conservation
Abstract
Establishing and maintaining protected areas (PAs) are key tools for biodiversity conservation. However, this approach is insufficient for many species, particularly those that are wide-ranging and sparse. The cheetah Acinonyx jubatus exemplifies such a species and faces extreme challenges to its survival. Here, we show that the global population is estimated at ∼7,100 individuals and confined to 9% of its historical distributional range. However, the majority of current range (77%) occurs outside of PAs, where the species faces multiple threats. Scenario modeling shows that, where growth rates are suppressed outside PAs, extinction rates increase rapidly as the proportion of population protected declines. Sensitivity analysis shows that growth rates within PAs have to be high if they are to compensate for declines outside. Susceptibility of cheetah to rapid decline is evidenced by recent rapid contraction in range, supporting an uplisting of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List threat assessment to endangered. Our results are applicable to other protection-reliant species, which may be subject to systematic underestimation of threat when there is insufficient information outside PAs. Ultimately, conserving many of these species necessitates a paradigm shift in conservation toward a holistic approach that incentivizes protection and promotes sustainable human-wildlife coexistence across large multiple-use landscapes.
Keywords: landscape conservation; megafauna; population viability analysis; protected areas; threat assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures






Comment in
-
When protected areas prove insufficient: Cheetah and "protection-reliant" species.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 17;114(3):430-431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619817114. Epub 2017 Jan 9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID: 28069967 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Barnosky AD, et al. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature. 2011;471(7336):51–57. - PubMed
-
- Mace GM, et al. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv Biol. 2008;22(6):1424–1442. - PubMed
-
- Martin LJ, Blossey B, Ellis E. Mapping where ecologists work: Biases in the global distribution of terrestrial ecological observations. Front Ecol Environ. 2012;10(4):195–201.
-
- Ripple WJ, et al. Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science. 2014;343(6167):1241484. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources