Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;6(2):020901.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.020901.

Preventing delayed diagnosis of cancer: clinicians' views on main problems and solutions

Affiliations

Preventing delayed diagnosis of cancer: clinicians' views on main problems and solutions

Lorainne Tudor Car et al. J Glob Health. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Delayed diagnosis is a major contributing factor to the UK's lower cancer survival compared to many European countries. In the UK, there is a significant national variation in early cancer diagnosis. Healthcare providers can offer an insight into local priorities for timely cancer diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to identify the main problems and solutions relating to delay cancer diagnosis according to cancer care clinicians.

Methods: We developed and implemented a new priority-setting approach called PRIORITIZE and invited North West London cancer care clinicians to identify and prioritize main causes for and solutions to delayed diagnosis of cancer care.

Results: Clinicians identified a number of concrete problems and solutions relating to delayed diagnosis of cancer. Raising public awareness, patient education as well as better access to specialist care and diagnostic testing were seen as the highest priorities. The identified suggestions focused mostly on the delays during referrals from primary to secondary care.

Conclusions: Many identified priorities were feasible, affordable and converged around common themes such as public awareness, care continuity and length of consultation. As a timely, proactive and scalable priority-setting approach, PRIORITZE could be implemented as a routine preventative system for determining patient safety issues by frontline staff.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRIORITIZE methodology flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Formula for calculating average experts’ agreement; q is a question that experts are being asked to evaluate competing patient safety threats.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The primary care cancer pathway in the UK (based on “National Patient Safety Agency. Delayed diagnosis of cancer: thematic review, 2010”).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Participants’ flow diagram.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of problems and solutions related to delayed diagnosis in cancer care in terms of the diagnostic process breakdown point.

References

    1. Neal RD, Tharmanathan P, France B, Din NU, Cotton S, Fallon-Ferguson J, et al. Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl 1):S92–107. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.48. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richards MA. The National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative in England: assembling the evidence. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(Suppl 2):S1–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605382. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:23–34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70546-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cancer Research UK. Cancer incidence in the UK in 2011. London, UK; 2011. Available: http://publications.cancerresearchuk.org/downloads/Product/CS_REPORT_INC.... Accessed: 2 November 2016.
    1. Hiom SC. Diagnosing cancer earlier: reviewing the evidence for improving cancer survival. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(Suppl 1):S1–5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.23. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms